Damages - wrongful arrest and detention - quantum of damages’ Minister of Safety and Security v Seymour 2006 6 SA 320 (SCA)

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Visser, P.J.
dc.date.accessioned 2009-05-21T12:34:22Z
dc.date.available 2009-05-21T12:34:22Z
dc.date.issued 2008-02
dc.description.abstract The judgment by Nugent JA (with whom Navsa and Heher JJA concurred) not only restates and applies well-known principles regarding the quantification of damages for wrongful arrest and detention, but also deals with the role of the Constitution in this regard. The court correctly places emphasis on the principle that the facts of each case are decisive in arriving at the appropriate amount of damages and that a comparison of awards made in previous cases must take proper account of this approach (see generally Visser and Potgieter Law of damages (2003) 472–474; Neethling, Potgieter and Visser Neethling’s Law of personality (2005) 121–122). en_US
dc.identifier.citation Visser, PJ 2008, 'Damages - wrongful arrest and detention - quantum of damages’ Minister of Safety and Security v Seymour 2006 6 SA 320 (SCA)', Journal of Contemporary Roman Dutch Law/Tydskrif Vir Hedendaagse Romeins-Hollandse Reg, vol. 71, pp. 173-177. [www.lexisnexis.co.za] en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1682-4490
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/10087
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher LexisNexis en_US
dc.rights LexisNexis en_US
dc.subject Wrongful arrest en_US
dc.subject Quantum of damages en_US
dc.subject Minister of Safety and Security v Seymour en_US
dc.subject.lcsh Damages -- South Africa en_US
dc.title Damages - wrongful arrest and detention - quantum of damages’ Minister of Safety and Security v Seymour 2006 6 SA 320 (SCA) en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record