The culture and subjectivity of neo-liberal governmentality

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Hofmeyr, Augusta Benda
dc.date.accessioned 2012-03-01T06:22:13Z
dc.date.available 2012-03-01T06:22:13Z
dc.date.issued 2011
dc.description.abstract This article forms part of an ongoing investigation into and research on the dynamics, culture and forms of subjectivity of neo-liberalism. Seen through the lens of French philosopher Michel Foucault’s analyses of neo-liberalism as a form of governmentality, neo-liberalism emerges as a political programme intent on subjecting the political sphere - along with every other dimension of contemporary existence - to an economic rationality. The focus of this article is on the impact on conditions of work and subjectivity of an economic rationality that has become the dominant political programme. In other words, Foucault’s analyses of neo-liberalism as a particular historical form of power called “governmentality” facilitate a critical understanding of the post-industrial culture of work and the concomitant mechanisms of subject-formation in the contemporary West. Like most concepts in Foucault’s diagnostic toolkit, governmentality is an analytical notion closely linked to changing historical rationalities of power, rather than a rigid descriptive mechanism that establishes one rationality of governing once and for all, that is the same for all times and places, and that infuses political orders in predictable, regular and uniform ways. It is my contention that Foucault’s analyses of neo-liberalism of the late 70s remain instructive and relevant to reach a critical appreciation of neoliberalism as a particular form of power that infuses the formation of culture and subjectivity in the present. This article utilises a historical approach in which one epoch, notion or governing rationality is understood in terms of that which precedes it, acknowledging some continuity while respecting and reflecting on discontinuity and differences. More specifically, I explore the post-industrial culture of work in terms of the preceding industrial age; biopower in terms of the preceding notion of disciplinary power; and neo-liberal governmentality in terms of the preceding liberal governing rationality. By way of an introduction and contextualisation of the problematics, I first outline the differences between the industrial and post-industrial paradigms of work from a sociological perspective (sections 2-4), before moving on to Foucault’s analyses of (neo)- liberal governmentality (sections 5-6). en_US
dc.description.librarian cp2012 en
dc.description.uri http://www.phronimon.co.za/ en_US
dc.identifier.citation Hofmeyr, B 2011, 'The culture and subjectivity of neo-liberal governmentality', Phronimon, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 19-42. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1561-4018
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/18322
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher South African Society for Greek Philosophy and the Humanities en_US
dc.rights South African Society for Greek Philosophy and the Humanities en_US
dc.subject Michel Foucault en_US
dc.subject Governmentality en_US
dc.subject Neo-liberalism en_US
dc.subject Political economy en_US
dc.subject Liberalism en_US
dc.subject Industrialism en_US
dc.subject Post-industrialism en_US
dc.subject Capitalism en_US
dc.subject Iron cage en_US
dc.subject Culture en_US
dc.subject Subjectivity en_US
dc.subject Discipline en_US
dc.subject Society of control en_US
dc.subject Biopolitics en_US
dc.subject Biopower en_US
dc.subject Liberty en_US
dc.subject Security en_US
dc.subject.lcsh Neoliberalism en
dc.subject.lcsh Economics en
dc.subject.lcsh Subjectivity en
dc.title The culture and subjectivity of neo-liberal governmentality en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record