Prosecuting terrorism in international tribunals

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Van der Vyver, J.D. (Johan David)
dc.date.accessioned 2011-08-19T11:49:27Z
dc.date.available 2011-08-19T11:49:27Z
dc.date.issued 2010
dc.description.abstract This Article explores the feasibility of prosecuting terrorism in international tribunals considering, respectively, the above three principles. Part I shows that terrorism comprises willful acts of violence directed against civilians with the intent to spread terror within a civilian population, plus the further intent for such terror to be the instrument through which the perpetrators seek to intimidate the powers that be into submitting to certain (mostly) political, ideological, or religious demands. Part II shows that the subject matter jurisdiction of some, but not all, international tribunals includes international terrorism. Part III seeks to discredit the view that a certain noble cause can legitimize terror violence as an instrument to realize such causes. en
dc.description.uri http://www.law.emory.edu/eilr en_US
dc.identifier.citation Johan D. van der Vyver, Prosecuting Terrorism in International Tribunals, 24 Emory International Law Review. 527 (2010) en
dc.identifier.issn 1052-2840
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/17088
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Emory International Law Review en_US
dc.rights Emory International Law Review en_US
dc.subject International tribunals en
dc.subject.lcsh International courts en
dc.subject.lcsh Jurisdiction (International law) en
dc.subject.lcsh Prosecution en
dc.subject.lcsh Terrorism en
dc.title Prosecuting terrorism in international tribunals en
dc.type Article en


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record