Effect of finishing systems on the surface roughness of an experimental low-shrinking composite resin

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Van der Vyver, Petrus Jacobus
dc.contributor.author De Wet, Francois A.
dc.date.accessioned 2010-06-30T08:52:10Z
dc.date.available 2010-06-30T08:52:10Z
dc.date.issued 2009-07
dc.description.abstract PURPOSE: This study evaluated the surface quality of a new low-shrinking experimental resin restorative material after polishing with seven different techniques. METHODS: The composite resin used in this study was the experimental material, Hermes (3M/ESPE). Seventy standardised specimens were prepared using a perspex mould. All samples were stored in distilled water for 10 days. Samples were randomly divided into 7 groups (n=10). Thereafter, the average roughness of one side of each specimen (formed against the matrix) was recorded using a surface roughness meter (Surftest SJ 301)(control). The other side of each specimen was roughened with 320grit silicone-carbide paper in a polishing machine for 45 seconds. The finishing/polishing of specimens was performed following the five different protocols according to the manufacturer’s instructions: (1) Enhance polishing cones (E), (2) Enhance followed by POGO (EPG), (3)Jiffy Polishing Cups (J), (4) consecutive use of four flexible Sof-Lex discs (S), (5) consecutive use of four flexible Sof-Lex discs followed by Sof-Lex brush(SB), (6) consecutive use of three flexible OpenDiscs (O), and (7) consecutive use of three flexible OpenDiscs followed by Openshine brushes (OB). The mean roughness of each polished surfaces was determined using the surface profilometer, collecting 5 measurements from each specimen. Data was analyzed statistically (ANOVA). Results: The mean average roughness (Ra) values obtained for specimens in Groups 2-8 that were treated with one of the polishing systems ranged from 0.63 – 1.21 μm. ANOVA analysis demonstrated a statistically significant difference between Enhance (roughest) compared to all the other groups (P <0.001). There were no statistical significant differences (p<0.001) between Groups 3(Enhance and POGO2), 4(Jiffy Polishing Cups), 5(Sof-Lex), 6(Sof-Lex and Sof-Lex Brushes), 7(OpenDiscs) and 8 (OpenDiscs and OpenShine Brushes). Clinical Significance: All the polishing techniques evaluated in this study, with the possible exception of Enhance Points, can be utilised to produce a smooth surface on Hermes composite resin material. The material Hermes can be polished to a high gloss and excellent smoothness, and will be acceptable for usage in the mouth. en_US
dc.identifier.citation Van der Vyver, PJ & De Wet, FA 2009, 'Effect of finishing systems on the surface roughness of an experimental low-shrinking composite resin', South African Dental Journal, vol. 64, no. 6, pp. 260-265. [www.sadanet.co.za] en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1029-4864
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2263/14365
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher South African Dental Association en_US
dc.rights © South African Dental Association en_US
dc.subject Low-shrinking composite resin en_US
dc.subject.lcsh Dental resins
dc.subject.lcsh Dental materials
dc.subject.lcsh Fillings (Dentistry)
dc.subject.lcsh Surface roughness -- Measurement
dc.title Effect of finishing systems on the surface roughness of an experimental low-shrinking composite resin en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record