Matthews, Steven H.Van Eck, Ernest2013-11-202013-11-202013-09-12Mathews, S.H. & Van Eck, E., 2013, 'Fasting, justification, and self-righteousness in Luke 18:9-14: A social-scientific interpretation as response to Friedrichson', HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies 69(1), Art. #1957, 9 pages. http://dx.DOI.org/ 10.4102/hts.v69i1.19570259-9422 (print)2078-8050 (online)10.4102/hts.v69i1.1957http://hdl.handle.net/2263/32531This article is based on the PhD thesis, ‘A socialscientific interpretation of fasting in the New Testament as a critical analysis of fasting in contemporary evangelicalism’, submitted in 2013 in the Department of Biblical and Religious Studies, Faculty of Humanities, University of Pretoria, with Prof. Dr Ernest van Eck as supervisor.This article provides a social-scientific interpretation of the role of fasting in Jesus’ parable of the Pharisee and the tax collector in Luke 18:9–14. Specifically, the article considers such social realia as honour and shame, collectivism, and purity in the interpretation of the text. The textual and social contexts of the text are considered. It is contended that in the parable Jesus presents a caricature of both the Pharisee and the tax collector to make a larger point, in which fasting is not a major consideration. The article also evaluates Friedrichson’s interpretation of this text, which depicts the Pharisee as fasting vicariously, resulting in the justification of the tax collector. Finally, the significance of this text in a holistic theology of fasting in the New Testament is considered.en© 2013. The Authors. Licensee: AOSIS OpenJournals. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License.FastingLuke 18:9–14Parable of the Pharisee and the tax collectorBible -- Criticism, interpretation, etc.Rites and ceremoniesArticle