Siziba, SimisoHall, J.H. (John Henry)2020-05-142021-02Siziba, S. & Hall, J.H. 2021, 'The evolution of the application of capital budgeting techniques in enterprises', Global Finance Journal, vol. 47, art. 100504, pp. 1-18.1044-028310.1016/j.gfj.2019.100504http://hdl.handle.net/2263/74586This study examines the evolution of the application of capital budgeting techniques. Previous studies mostly used cross-sectional inquiries to understand the capital budgeting practices of firms. Only a few researchers have undertaken longitudinal studies to generalise the findings of the individual cross-sectional studies to the wider population and to identify the emerging trends in the use of capital budgeting techniques (CBTs). This longitudinal study surveys 83 studies of capital budgeting practices across firms in India, South Africa, the United Kingdom (UK) and the United States of America (USA) for the period from 1966 to 2016. The findings show that six capital budgeting techniques, namely, the net present value (NPV), the internal rate of return (IRR), the payback period (PBP), the accounting rate of return (ARR), the return on investment (ROI) and the real option valuation (ROV), are the most popular methods for evaluating capital investments. Of these techniques, the ROV is the least used, and a general lack of familiarity with this technique and its complexity are the most commonly cited reasons for not using it. Another method that is used less than the first four techniques is the ROI. However, this technique is of growing significance and is mainly used in the UK, followed by the USA, South Africa, and India. Firms in the USA and UK have increased their use of the IRR as a primary method for evaluating capital projects and have retained the PBP as an ancillary technique to strengthen the available information when evaluating capital projects. Firms in India and South Africa are increasingly excluding both the PBP and ARR methods and are increasingly using the NPV when evaluating capital investments. Although this development is in line with the theory, it limits the scope of the available information when evaluating capital projects.en© 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Notice : this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Global Finance Journal. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. A definitive version was subsequently published in Global Finance Journal, vol. 47, art. 100504, pp. 1-18, 2021. doi : 10.1016/j.gfj.2019.100504.Capital budgeting technique (CBT)United Kingdom (UK)United States of America (USA)Net present value (NPV)Internal rate of return (IRR)Payback period (PBP)Return on investment (ROI)Accounting rate of return (ARR)TrendsInvestment appraisalLongitudinal analysisPostprint Article