Orsmond, C.P.M.Pistorius, Petrus Christiaan2011-05-032011-05-032011-02Orsmond, CPM & Pistorius, PC 2011, 'Filler selection for weldments in Type 316L stainless steel, for hot organic acid service', Corrosion Engineering, Science and Technology, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 24-31. [http://www.maney.co.uk]1478-422x1743-2282(online)10.1179/147842210X12754747500441http://hdl.handle.net/2263/16426The weld metal corrodes much faster than the parent metal, if Type 316L welded with a matching filler is exposed to hot organic acids. Nine commercial filler metals were evaluated by preparing welded coupons, and exposing these to different plant environments (with different organic acid mixtures and temperatures) for several months. The filler metals were chosen to yield different solidification modes, and to vary chromium, molybdenum and nickel contents. Only filler metals which are much more highly alloyed than the parent metal gave lower corrosion rates than the parent metal. Partitioning during and after solidification, and the average alloy content, both affect weld bead corrosion.en© 2011 Institute of Materials, Minerals and Mining. Published by Maney on behalf of the Institute.Austenitic stainless steelWeldsHot organic acidSolidification modeStainless steel -- WeldingWelded steel structuresWelded joints -- FatigueFiller selection for weldments in Type 316L stainless steel, for hot organic acid servicePostprint Article