Koot, StasjaKhumûb, Moses2025-09-252025-09-252024-08Koot, S. & Khumub, Moses 2024, 'History and social complexities for San at Tsintsabis resettlement farm, Namibia', Chapter of: Etosha Pan to the Skeleton Coast: Conservation Histories, Policies and Practices in North-west Namibia (pp. 427–444). https://doi.org/10.11647/OBP.0402.16.978180511296910.11647/OBP.0402.16http://hdl.handle.net/2263/104447The theme of the 1950s eviction of Haiǁom Indigenous people from the protected area that becameEtosha National Park is continued in this chapter. After this event, many Haiǁom San became farm workers. Having lost their lands under colonialism and apartheid to nature conservation and largescale livestock ranching, most remained living in the margins of society at the service of white farmers, conservationists or the South African Defence Force. After Independence in 1990, group resettlement farms became crucial to address historically built-up inequalities by providing marginalised groups with opportunities to start self-sufficient small-scale agriculture. This chapter addresses the history of the Tsintsabis resettlement farm, just over a 100 kms east of Etosha National Park, where at first predominantly Haiǁom (and to a lesser degree !Xun) were “resettled” on their own ancestral land, some as former evictees from the park. The history of Tsintsabis is analysed in relation to two pressing, and related, social complexities at this resettlement farm, namely: 1) ethnic tension and in-migration; and 2) leadership. The chapter argues that the case of Tsintsabis shows the importance of acknowledging historically built-up injustices when addressing current social complexities. The importance of doing long-term ethno-historical research about resettlement is thereby emphasised so as to be able to better understand the contextual processes within which resettlement is embedded.en© 2024 Stasja Koot & Moses ǁKhumûb, CC BY-NC 4.0. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)NamibiaLand reformIndependenceResettlementBook chapter