Maziwisa, Michelle Rufaro2024-11-182024-11-182024-122024-08*D2024http://hdl.handle.net/2263/99101Mini Dissertation (LLM (Sexual and Reproductive Rights))--University of Pretoria, 2024.Zimbabwe, Botswana and Namibia are parties to international treaties and standards that recognise or are relevant to the protection of reproductive rights for women and have made them justiciable through constitutional recognition. However, the realisation and protection of these rights through these countries’ national judicial enforcement mechanisms are hampered by procedural rules and standards that act as effective barriers for women to access the courts. The study examines the limitations of enforcing reproductive rights through the courts, focusing on common law delict claims illustrated by three decided reproductive rights cases in Zimbabwe, Botswana and Namibia. The study also examines best practices for the enforcement of reproductive rights and makes recommendations to mitigate the barriers.en© 2023 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria.UCTDWomen's rightsReproductive rightsLitigationJusticeJudicial enforcementRemediesSustainable Development Goals (SDGs)SDG-05: Gender equalityLaw theses SDG-05SDG-10: Reduced inequalitiesLaw theses SDG-10SDG-16: Peace, justice and strong institutionsLaw theses SDG-16Legal rules and procedures as barriers for judicial enforcement of women’s reproductive rights in Zimbabwe, Namibia and BotswanaMini Dissertationu22966260Disclaimer Letter