Smith, G.F. (Gideon Francois), 1959-Figueiredo, EstrelaMoore, Gerry2012-05-022012-05-022011-02Smith, GF, Figueiredo, E & Moore, G 2011, 'Who amends the international code of botanical nomenclature? A response to Applequist & al. (2010)', Taxon, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 213-215.0040-0262http://hdl.handle.net/2263/18665We maintain that a review of the way in which votes that can be cast to influence the amendment of the International Code of Botanical Nomenclature (ICBN) are allocated is overdue. Although there will no doubt be resistance to proposed changes that may emanate from such a review, a more representative system of vote allocation to herbaria, among other things, will considerably enhance the credibility and robustness of the voting system. A rebuttal addressing two criteria we suggest as examples of what could be used as part of a review to make the voting system more representative was recently published by Applequist & al. It is regrettable that in the face of unambiguous statistics that show the inadequacy of the current ICBN amendment voting system, the need for change is not embraced with due urgency. A fear of power sharing and decentralization may well be the root cause.en© 2011 by International Association for Plant TaxonomyInternational Botanical Congress (17th : 2005 : Vienna, Austria)International Code of Botanical Nomenclature, 2006Amendment voting systemPlants -- Developing countries -- Nomenclature -- Decision makingVoting research -- Developing countriesPlants -- NomenclatureArticle