Dludla, AndileForman, Tarryn B.Lloyd, Mikaela K.Moodley, Savannah O.Pillay, Sarveshvari B.Kruger, Esedra2025-06-182025-06-182025-02Dludla, A., Forman, T.B., Lloyd, M.K., Moodley, S.O., Pillay, S.B. & Krüger, E., 2025, ‘Speech-language therapists’ views of oral feeding of infants on high-flow oxygen’, Health SA Gesondheid 30(0), a2809. https://doi.org/10.4102/hsag.v30i0.2809.1025-9848 (print)2071-9736 (online)10.4102/hsag.v30i0.2809http://hdl.handle.net/2263/102867DATA AVAILABILITY : The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, E.K. upon reasonable request.BACKGROUND : Introduction of oral feeding for young children receiving high-flow oxygen has recently gained interest. With limited literature, there are varied opinions regarding the safety of oral feeding in this population. AIM : This study describes speech-language therapists’ (SLTs) views on oral feeding for infants receiving high-flow oxygen. SETTING : A South African online survey study. METHODS : A descriptive quantitative survey was distributed electronically via social networking sites. Purposive and snowball sampling were used to recruit expert SLTs. Twenty-one South African SLTs working with paediatric swallowing and feeding, from nine provinces responded. Data were analysed descriptively. RESULTS : Of 21 responses, only nine were fully complete, indicative of how few South African SLTs work with infants on high-flow oxygen. Current oral feeding practices varied with differences between nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) and high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC). Strategies for oral feeding included volume and time limitations, monitoring physiological stability and assessing for aspiration. Thin liquids were most commonly used. Varied opinions, with no protocols or guidelines for introduction of oral feeding of young children on high-flow oxygen, are reported. CONCLUSION : SLTs’ practices regarding oral feeding in infants/children receiving high-flow oxygen are variable. Professionals share common approaches to determine feeding readiness and monitor tolerance. Without guidelines and standardised protocols, SLTs are left to make decisions based only on experience. A need exists for further research. CONTRIBUTION : There is variability in initiation of oral feeds, highlighting the need for further data to inform uniform protocol and guideline development to enhance SLTs’ decision-making.en© 2025. The Authors. Licensee: AOSIS. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License.Oral feedingSpeech-language therapist (SLT)Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP)High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC)High-flow oxygenInfantYoung childSurveyArticle