Du Toit, Jacques LouisBoshoff, NeliusMariette, Paul Niclesse2017-11-202017-11-202017Du Toit, J., Boshoff, N. & Mariette, N. 2017, 'Normative versus actual methodologies in planning research : a hybrid picture', Journal of Planning Education and Research, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 477-487.1552-6577 (online)0739-456X (print)10.1177/0739456X16658095http://hdl.handle.net/2263/63210What methodologies do we write about, and what type of research do we actually conduct and build upon in planning? Since the 1980s, planners have argued for more qualitative research within an interpretative paradigm. A content analysis of articles in Journal of Planning Education and Research do show a majority of qualitative studies, but cast within a pragmatic rather than an interpretative paradigm. More recently, planners have reiterated the need for qualitative research, especially participatory and applied forms of research within a critical social science paradigm. Some recommendations for planning education and research are discussed.en© The Author(s) 2016Citation impactResearch methodologyPlanning researchPlanning educationEngineering, built environment and information technology articles SDG-04SDG-04: Quality educationEngineering, built environment and information technology articles SDG-09SDG-09: Industry, innovation and infrastructureEngineering, built environment and information technology articles SDG-11SDG-11: Sustainable cities and communitiesEngineering, built environment and information technology articles SDG-16SDG-16: Peace, justice and strong institutionsEngineering, built environment and information technology articles SDG-17SDG-17: Partnerships for the goalsPostprint Article