Barac, KarinCoetzee, G.P. (Philna)Erasmus, Lourens J.Fourie, HoudiniMotubatse, Kgobalale NebbelPlant, KatoSteyn, BlancheVan Staden, J.M.2013-11-112013-11-112013Barac, K, Coetzee, GP, Erasmus, LJ, Fourie, H, Motubatse, KN, Plant, K, Steyn, H & Van Staden, JM 2013, 'Internal auditing : how South Africa compares', Southern African Journal of Accountability and Auditing Research, vol. 15, pp. 1-2.1028-9003http://hdl.handle.net/2263/32345Despite South Africa being considered a developing country, internal auditing has developed a robust presence both in the private and public sectors. The CBOK research (conducted by the IIA’s IIARF) shows that local internal audit functions compare well with other more developed regions around the world. A factor that has contributed to the strength of South African internal auditing is the support contained in legislation and private sector codes of corporate governance: the Public Finance Management Act (PFMA) and the Municipal Finance Management Act (MFMA) continue to underpin public sector advances, while the King ll and King lll reports, with their codes of corporate governance, apply to all sectors in South Africa. All of this has placed South Africa’s internal audit functions collectively in a leadership role in Africa.enSouthern African Institute of Government AuditorsSouth AfricaInternal auditingInternal auditing : how South Africa comparesArticle