Van Marle, Karin2011-10-062011-10-062010Van Marle, K 2010, 'Reflections on post-apartheid being and becoming in the aftermath of amnesty : Du Toit v Minister of Safety and Security', Constitutional Court Review, vol. 3, pp. 347-367.2073-6215http://hdl.handle.net/2263/17406In this note I discuss the case of Du Toit v Minister of Safety and Security (Du Toit). Also, although my main focus will fall on Du Toit, I refer to the recent defamation case of Robert McBride briefly. Both these cases disclose a few of the many complexities of the 'intersection' between an apartheid past and a future that is post-apartheid, particularly post-apartheid being or rather becoming. Beyond illuminating the wider questions of post-apartheid being, becoming and subjectivity, these cases also contribute to something more specific, namely the becoming of a post-apartheid jurisprudence.en© 2010 PULP (Pretoria University Law Press) All rights reserved.Du Toit v Minister of Safety and SecurityPost-apartheid era -- South AfricaAmnesty -- South AfricaJurisprudence -- South AfricaApartheid -- South AfricaReflections on post-apartheid being and becoming in the aftermath of amnesty : Du Toit v Minister of Safety and SecurityArticle