Sandstrom, JosefinSwanepoel, De WetLaurent, ClaudeUmefjord, GoranLundberg, Thorbjorn2021-11-222021-11-222020-06Sandström J, Swanepoel D, Laurent C, Umefjord G, Lundberg T. Accuracy and Reliability of Smartphone Self-Test Audiometry in Community Clinics in Low Income Settings: A Comparative Study. Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology. 2020;129(6):578-584. doi:10.1177/0003489420902162.0003-4894 (print)1943-572X (online)10.1177/0003489420902162http://hdl.handle.net/2263/82791BACKGROUND : There is a lack of hearing health care globally, and tele-audiology and mobile technologies have been proposed as important strategies to reduce the shortfall. OBJECTIVES : To investigate the accuracy and reliability of smartphone self-test audiometry in adults, in community clinics in low-income settings. METHODS : A prospective, intra-individual, repeated measurements design was used. Sixty-three adult participants (mean age 52 years, range 20-88 years) were recruited from ENT and primary health care clinics in a low-income community in Tshwane, South Africa. Air conduction hearing thresholds for octave frequencies 0.5 to 8 kHz collected with the smartphone self-test in non-sound treated environments were compared to those obtained by reference audiometry. RESULTS : The overall mean difference between threshold seeking methods (ie, smartphone thresholds subtracted from reference) was −2.2 dB HL (n = 467 thresholds, P = 0.00). Agreement was within 10 dB HL for 80.1% (n = 467 thresholds) of all threshold comparisons. Sensitivity for detection hearing loss >40 dB HL in one ear was 90.6% (n = 84 ears), and specificity 94.2% (n = 84 ears). CONCLUSION : Smartphone self-test audiometry can provide accurate and reliable air conduction hearing thresholds for adults in community clinics in low-income settings.en© The Author(s) 2020AudiometryGlobal healthHearing lossMobile health (mHealth)SmartphoneTelemedicinePostprint Article