Van den Brom, Luco J.2017-03-012016-10Luco J. van den Brom (2015) A theological alternative to Grube’s notion of ‘justified religious difference’, International Journal of Philosophy and Theology, 76:5, 453-457, DOI: 10.1080/21692327.2016.1142672.2169-2327 (print)2169-2335 (online)10.1080/21692327.2016.1142672http://hdl.handle.net/2263/59214Grube proposes a framework for respectful dealing with different religions: ‘justified religious difference. The author comments on the epistemic setting of Grube’s thesis. It testifies a cognitive approach to religious faith by handling religious faith and epistemic belief as analogous argument. His criticism of the pluralist approach is not very convincing. This framework is too abstract for an interreligious dialogue. The author proposes a concept of religious faith within a web of practices, liturgical rituals. A concrete interreligious dialogue can enrich the Christian faith in its practical styling.en© 2016 International Journal of Philosophy and Theology. This is an electronic version of an article published in International Journal of Philosophy and Theology, vol. 76, no. 5, pp. 453-457, 2016. doi : 10.1080/21692327.2016.1142672. International Journal of Philosophy and Theology is available online at http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rjpt20.Religious diversityInterreligious dialoguePluralist hypothesisNon-traditional epistemologyFaith as personal knowledgeTheology articles SDG-10SDG-10: Reduced inequalitiesTheology articles SDG-16SDG-16: Peace, justice and strong institutionsPostprint Article