Groenewald, Andre JohannesKoekemoer, J.H. (Johannes Hendrik), 1935-2012-01-112012-01-111998Groenewald, AJ & Koekemoer, JH 1998. 'Nietzsche se uitspraak God-is-dood en die interpretasievoorstelle van Hans Kung en Jurgen Moltmann', HTS Teologiese Studies/ Theological Studies, vol. 54, no. 3&4, pp. 672-6860259-9422 (print)http://hdl.handle.net/2263/17757Spine cut of Journal binding and pages scanned on flatbed EPSON Expression 10000 XL; 400dpi; text/lineart - black and white - stored to Tiff Derivation: Abbyy Fine Reader v.9 work with PNG-format (black and white); Photoshop CS3; Adobe Acrobat v.9 Web display format PDFIn this article the meaning and significance of Nietzsche's theorem 'God is dead' is examined. Through the reading models of Hans Küng and Jürgen Moltmann, an attempt is made to indicate that Nietzsche did not per se acknowledge or deny the existence of God. These reading models, although different, eliminate various theological misunderstandings and misinterpretations. This is important for the current theological debate.15 pagesPDFAfrikaansFaculty of Theology, University of PretoriaGod-is-dead theoryMoltmann, JurgenKung, HansJurgen Moltmann (1926- )Nihilism -- Religious aspects--ChristianityResurrectionSuffering of GodNietzsche se uitspraak God-is-dood en die interpretasievoorstelle van Hans Kung en Jurgen MoltmannNietzsche's theorem God-is-dead and the reading models of Hans Kung and Jurgen MoltmannArticle