Layard, AntoniaMarshall, AdamDe Vito, LauraFew, RogerHatzisavvidou, SophiaMabon, LeslieSelomane, Odirilwe2025-04-102025-04-102024-08Layard, A., Marshall, A., De Vito, L. et al. 2024, 'Protecting everyday nature', Journal of Environmental Law, vol. 36, pp. 275-299. https://DOI.org/10.1093/jel/eqae018.0952-8873 (print)1464-374X (online)10.1093/jel/eqae018http://hdl.handle.net/2263/101999‘Everyday nature’, understood as people’s ability to access nature nearby, should be protected in law and planning policy, facilitating three key benefits: (1) human health and wellbeing; (2) intrinsic and extrinsic ecological advantages; and (3) supporting the UK’s 30by30 nature conservation commitment. Yet there are three obstacles to the protection of everyday nature: (1) the prioritisation of ‘special’ and ‘priority’ nature conservation habitats; (2) the lack of protection for Local Wildlife Sites; as well as (3) counter-intuitively, the rise of biodiversity as a preferred governing concept. Addressing these obstacles, the paper develops the concept of everyday nature, making four proposals for change: (1) improved conceptual analysis; (2) confirming current policy on Local Wildlife Sites; (3) implementing the concept of everyday nature in legislation and planning policy; and (4) implementing the Government’s target that everyone lives within a 15-minute walk from a green or blue space.en© The Author(s) 2024. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.NatureNature conservationBiodiversityJust transitionPlanningHousingEveryday natureSDG-15: Life on landArticle