Visagie, Cobus M.Yilmaz, NerimanAllison, Jeremy D.Barreto, R.W.Boekhout, TeunBoers, J.Delgado, M.A.Dewing, ClaudetteFitza, Katrin N.E.Furtado, E.C.A.Gaya, E.Hill, R.Hobden, A.Hu, D.M.Hülsewig, T.Khonsanit, A.Luangsa-ard, J.J.Mthembu, AlicePereira, C.M.Price, Jenna-LeePringle, A.Qikani, NombuleloSandoval-Denis, M.Schumacher, R.K.Seifert, K.A.Slippers, BernardTennakoon, D.S.Thanakitpipattana, D.Van Vuuren, Nicole InnikeGroenewald, Johannes ZachariasCrous, Pedro W.2024-07-222024-07-222024-06Visagie, C.M., Yilmaz, N., Allison, J.D., Barreto, R.W., Boekhout, T., Boers, .J, Delgado,MA, Dewing, C., Fitza, K.N.E., Furtado, E.C.A., Gaya, E., Hill, R., Hobden, A., Hu, D.M., Hülsewig, T., Khonsanit, A., Kolecka, A., Luangsa-ard, J.J., Mthembu, A., Pereira, C.M., Price, J.-L., Pringle, A., Qikani, N., Sandoval-Denis, M., Schumacher, R.K., Slippers, B., Tennakoon, D.S., Thanakitpipattana, D., Van Vuuren, N.I., Groenewald, J.Z., Crous, P.W. (2024). New and Interesting Fungi. 7. Fungal Systematics and Evolution 13: 441–494. doi : –494. doi: 10.3114/fuse.2024.13.12.2589-3823 (print)2589-3831 (online)10.3114/fuse.2024.13.12http://hdl.handle.net/2263/97151SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: FigShare doi: 10.25403/UPre- searchdata.26176783. FIG. S1. Single gene phylogenies of Penicillium sect. Fasciculata ser. Camembertiorum based on BenA, CaM, RPB1, RPB2, Cct8 and Tsr1. Datasets were aligned using MAFFT v. 7.520 (Katoh & Standley 2013) and a Maximum Likelihood tree was calculated in IQ-TREE v. 2.2.2.6 (Minh et al. 2020). The the most appropriate nucleotide substitution model based on the Akaike information criterion was applied to each region and its exons and introns using PartitionFinder v. 2 (Lanfear et al. 2017). The trees were rooted to P. expansum. Penicillium dabashanicum strains are shown in coloured bold text. Branch support in nodes higher than 80 % bootstrap are indicated above branches (T = ex-type). FIG. S2. Single gene phylogenies of Penicillium subg. Penicillium based on ITS, BenA, CaM and RPB2. Datasets were aligned using MAFFT v. 7.520 (Katoh & Standley 2013) and a Maximum Likelihood tree was calculated in IQ-TREE v. 2.2.2.6 (Minh et al. 2020). The nucleotide substitution model GTR+I+G was applied to each region and its exons and introns (Abadi et al. 2019). The trees were rooted to P. glabrum. Penicillium pascuigraminis is shown in coloured bold text. Branch support in nodes higher than 80 % bootstrap are indicated above branches (T = ex-type). FIG. S3. Single gene phylogenies of Penicillium sect. Canescentia ser. Atroveneta based on BenA, CaM and RPB2. Datasets were aligned using MAFFT v. 7.520 (Katoh & Standley 2013) and a Maximum Likelihood tree was calculated in IQ-TREE v. 2.2.2.6 (Minh et al. 2020). The nucleotide substitution model GTR+I+G was applied to each region and its exons and introns (Abadi et al. 2019). The trees were rooted to P. canescens. Penicillium viridipigmentum is shown in coloured bold text. Branch support in nodes higher than 80 % bootstrap are indicated above branches (T = ex-type). FIG. S4. Single gene phylogenies of Talaromyces sect. Islandici based on ITS, BenA, CaM and RPB2. Datasets were aligned using MAFFT v. 7.520 (Katoh & Standley 2013) and a Maximum Likelihood tree was calculated in IQ-TREE v. 2.2.2.6 (Minh et al. 2020). The nucleotide substitution model GTR+I+G was applied to each region and its exons and introns (Abadi et al. 2019). The trees were rooted to T. subinflatus. Talaromyces podocarpi is shown in coloured bold text. Branch support in nodes higher than 80 % bootstrap are indicated above branches (T = ex-type). TABLE S1. List of species, vouchers and GenBank accession numbers of sequences used in this study. TABLE S2. Strains used for phylogenetic comparisons of Anthracocystis. TABLE S3. GenBank accession numbers of additional isolates included in phylogenetic analyses of the genus Bisifusarium. TABLE S4. Strains used for phylogenetic comparisons of Devriesia and related genera. TABLE S5. Strains used for phylogenetic comparisons of Ericboehmia thailandica and related species. TABLE S6. GenBank accession numbers of additional isolates included in phylogenetic analyses of the Fusarium redolens species complex. TABLE S7. GenBank accession numbers of additional isolates included in phylogenetic analyses of the genus Macroconia. TABLE S8. Strains used for phylogenetic comparisons of Penicillium cederbergense and related species. TABLE S9. Strains used for phylogenetic comparisons of Penicillium dabashanicum and related species. TABLE S10. Strains used for phylogenetic comparisons of Penicillium pascuigraminis and related species. TABLE S11. Strains used for phylogenetic comparisons of Penicillium viridipigmentum and related species. TABLE S12. Strains used for phylogenetic comparisons of Talaromyces podocarpi and related species.Two new genera, 17 new species, two epitypes, and six interesting new host and / or geographical records are introduced in this study. New genera include: Cadophorella (based on Cadophorella faginea) and Neosatchmopsis (based on Neosatchmopsis ogrovei). New species include: Alternaria halotolerans (from hypersaline sea water, Qatar), Amylostereum stillwellii (from mycangia of Sirex areolatus, USA), Angiopsora anthurii (on leaves of Anthurium andraeanum, Brazil), Anthracocystis zeae-maydis (from pre-stored Zea mays, South Africa), Bisifusarium solicola (from soil, South Africa), Cadophorella faginea (from dead capsule of Fagus sylvatica, Germany), Devriesia mallochii (from house dust, Canada), Fusarium kirstenboschense (from soil, South Africa), Macroconia podocarpi (on ascomata of ascomycete on twigs of Podocarpus falcatus, South Africa), Neosatchmopsis ogrovei (on Eucalyptus leaf litter, Spain), Ophiocordyceps kuchinaraiensis (on Coleoptera larva, Thailand), Penicillium cederbergense (from soil, South Africa), Penicillium pascuigraminis (from pasture mulch, South Africa), Penicillium viridipigmentum (from soil, South Africa), Pleurotheciella acericola (on stem, bark of living tree of Acer sp., Germany), Protocreopsis physciae (on Physcia caesia, Netherlands), and Talaromyces podocarpi (from soil, South Africa).en© 2024 Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute. This article is Open Access under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY-NC-ND licence.BiodiversityITS barcodesMulti-gene phylogenyNew taxaSystematicsTypificationSDG-15: Life on landArticle