Swanepoel, De WetMatthysen, CorneliaEikelboom, Robert H.Clark, Jackie L.Hall, James Wilbur2016-04-212015-10De Wet Swanepoel, Cornelia Matthysen, Robert H Eikelboom, Jackie L Clark & James W Hall III (2015) Pure-tone audiometry outside a sound booth using earphone attentuation, integrated noise monitoring, and automation, International Journal of Audiology 54:11, 777-785 DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2015.1072647.1499-2027 (print)1708-8186 (online)10.3109/14992027.2015.1072647http://hdl.handle.net/2263/52081OBJECTIVE : Accessibility of audiometry is hindered by the cost of sound booths and shortage of hearing health personnel. This study investigated the validity of an automated mobile diagnostic audiometer with increased attenuation and real-time noise monitoring for clinical testing outside a sound booth. DESIGN : Attenuation characteristics and reference ambient noise levels for the computer-based audiometer (KUDUwave) was evaluated alongside the validity of environmental noise monitoring. Clinical validity was determined by comparing air and bone conduction thresholds obtained inside and outside the sound booth (23 subjects). Test-retest reliability was established for a sub-group of 11 subjects. RESULTS : Improved passive attenuation and valid environmental noise monitoring was demonstrated. Clinically, air conduction thresholds inside and outside the sound booth, corresponded within 5 dB or less >90% of instances (mean absolute difference 3.3 ± 3.2SD). Bone conduction thresholds corresponded within 5 dB or less in 80% of comparisons between test environments, with a mean absolute difference of 4.6 dB (3.7SD). Threshold differences were not statistically significant. Mean absolute testretest differences outside the sound booth was similar to those in the booth. CONCLUSION : Diagnostic pure tone audiometry outside a sound booth using automated testing, improved passive attenuation, and real-time environmental noise monitoring demonstrated reliable hearing assessments.en© 2015 British Society of Audiology, International Society of Audiology, and Nordic Audiological Society. This is an electronic version of an article published in International Journal of Audiology, vol. 54, no. 11, pp. 777-785, 2015. doi : 10.3109/14992027.2015.1072647. International Journal of Audiology is available online at : http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/iija20.AudiometryAutomated audiometryAttenuationDiagnostic hearing assessmentNoise monitoringMaximum permissible ambient noise levelsOccupational hearing assessmentPostprint Article