Tolmie, D.F. (D. Francois)2013-01-212013-01-211996Tolmie, DF 1996. 'John 21:24-25: A case of failed attestation?', Skrif en Kerk, vol. 17, no.2, pp 420-426.0257-8891(print)2074-7705 (online)http://hdl.handle.net/2263/20843Continued 2001 as 'Verbum et Ecclesia'Spine cut of Journal binding and pages scanned on flatbed EPSON Expression 10000 XL; 400dpi; text/lineart - black and white - stored to Tiff Derivation: Abbyy Fine Reader v.9 work with PNG-format (black and white); Photoshop CS3; Adobe Acrobat v.9 Web display format PDFIn this article the tendency to interpret John 21:24-25 narratologically as a highly sophisticated and effective technique is disputed. Instead it is argued that the Beloved Disciple is identified in these verses as the real author of the Gospel and that the dominating function in John 21 :24-25 is the testimonial function (also known as the function of attestation). It is also argued that the intended effect of this junction is undermined by the awkward manner in which it is fulfilled.7 pagesPDFenFaculty of Theology, University of PretoriaBible -- N.T. -- John 21:24-25John 21:24-25: a case of failed attestation?Article