Viljoen, Frans2024-11-142024-11-142024-12-102024*D2024http://hdl.handle.net/2263/99091Mini Dissertation (LLM (Human Rights and Democratisation in Africa))--University of Pretoria, 2024.Despite the progressive decisions by the African Court and Commission on indigenous peoples in Kenya, their rights continue to be violated. Notably, Kenya has not implemented the Ogiek and Endorois decisions by the African Court and Commission respectively. This study looks at the follow-up mechanisms that the African Court and the African Commission have adopted to ensure the implementation of their decisions generally, and in the Endorois and Ogiek decisions specifically. It also looks at the steps that Kenya has taken to implement these decisions. It looks at some of the challenges which have been experienced by Kenya, the African Court and the Commission which have hampered the effective implementation of these decisions. The study borrows from the best practices of the American Court and Commission. It specifically looks at follow-up mechanisms, and makes a case for borrowing from these experiences, since they have largely been effective in ensuring implementation of the decisions by the inter-American Court and Commission.en© 2023 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria.UCTDFollow-upMechanismsImplementationAfrican CourtAfrican CommissionKenyaSustainable Development Goals (SDGs)SDG-10: Reduced inequalitiesLaw theses SDG-10SDG-16: Peace, justice and strong institutionsLaw theses SDG-16Mini Dissertationu2409433210.25403/UPresearchdata.27703044