Potgieter, Jenni-MaríSwanepoel, De WetMyburgh, Hermanus CarelSmits, Cas2018-09-122018-07Potgieter, J.M., Swanepoel, D., Myburgh, H.C. et al. 2018, 'The South African English digits-in-noise hearing test : effect of age, hearing loss, and speaking competence', Ear and Hearing, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 656–663.0196-0202 (print)1538-4667 (online)10.1097/AUD.0000000000000522http://hdl.handle.net/2263/66531OBJECTIVES : This study determined the effect of hearing loss and English-speaking competency on the South African English digits-in-noise hearing test to evaluate its suitability for use across native (N) and non-native (NN) speakers. DESIGN : A prospective cross-sectional cohort study of N and NN English adults with and without sensorineural hearing loss compared pure-tone air conduction thresholds to the speech reception threshold (SRT) recorded with the smartphone digits-in-noise hearing test. A rating scale was used for NN English listeners’ self-reported competence in speaking English. This study consisted of 454 adult listeners (164 male, 290 female; range 16 to 90 years), of whom 337 listeners had a best ear four-frequency pure-tone average (4FPTA; 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz) of <=25 dB HL. RESULTS : A linear regression model identified three predictors of the digits-in-noise SRT, namely, 4FPTA, age, and self-reported English-speaking competence. The NN group with poor self-reported English-speaking competence (<=5/10) performed significantly (p < 0.01) poorer than the N and NN (>=6/10) groups on the digits-in-noise test. Screening characteristics of the test improved with separate cutoff values depending on English-speaking competence for the N and NN groups (>=6/10) and NN group alone (<=5/10). Logistic regression models, which include age in the analysis, showed a further improvement in sensitivity and specificity for both groups (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.962 and 0.903, respectively). CONCLUSIONS : Self-reported English-speaking competence had a significant influence on the SRT obtained with the smartphone digits- in-noise test. A logistic regression approach considering SRT, self-reported English-speaking competence, and age as predictors of best ear 4FPTA >25 dB HL showed that the test can be used as an accurate hearing screening tool for N and NN English speakers. The smartphone digits-in-noise test, therefore, allows testing in a multilingual population familiar with English digits using dynamic cutoff values that can be chosen according to self-reported English-speaking competence and age.en© 2018 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. This is a non-final version of an article published in final form in Ear and Hearing, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 656–663, 2018. doi : 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000522.Speech reception threshold (SRT)Digits-in-noise (DIN)Hearing lossHearing screeningHearing testSmartphoneSpeech-in-noiseIntelligibilityTelephoneListenersValidationDigit triplet testOlder adultsUnited States (US)Screening testSpeech recognition abilitiesPostprint Article