Assessing forest-based rural communities' adaptive capacity and coping strategies for climate variability and change :  the case of Vhembe district in South Africa

dc.contributor.authorOfoegbu, Chidiebere
dc.contributor.authorChirwa, Paxie W.
dc.contributor.authorFrancis, J.
dc.contributor.authorBabalola, Folaranmi Dapo
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-24T07:40:36Z
dc.date.available2017-05-24T07:40:36Z
dc.date.issued2016-04en
dc.descriptionChidiebere Ofoegbu undertake this research as part of his Ph.D. in Forestry studies.en
dc.description.abstractIn this study, various coping strategies used by forest-based rural communities in Vhembe District of South Africa in response to climate variability and change challenges were investigated. The effect of community socio-demographic characteristics on the adaptive capacity and choice/effectiveness of coping strategies was examined. Household level data were collected from 366 respondents selected from 21 rural communities using the proportionate random sampling procedure. The Pearson Chi-square test was used to analyse the coping strategies. The effects of household and community socio-demographic characteristics on choice and effectiveness of coping strategies were determined using the binary logit model. It was observed that the respondents used diverse coping strategies, depending on the nature of climate variability and extreme weather events they were confronted with. Rainwater harvesting was the most popular strategy that the respondents in Makhado (90%), Mutale (96.3%), and Thulamela (50%) used to cope with erratic rainfall. Tree planting around houses and on farmland were the most popular strategies (90 100%) to counter the effects of extreme temperature. Furthermore, household and community demographic characteristics in particular education and skills levels, and forest products, institutional services and infrastructure available in the communities such as markets, and water supply facilities significantly (p&#0600.05) influenced the choice of households' coping strategies. Therefore, it can be hypothesized that efforts that enhance the household's capacity and community infrastructural development might be viable and sustainable ways of improving rural communities' resilience to climate change and variability challenges.en
dc.description.departmentPlant Production and Soil Scienceen
dc.description.sponsorshipThe National Research Foundation of South Africa and South Africa Forestry Company Limited (SAFCOL)(Grant UID: 82942) funded this research through the Forestry Postgraduate Programme at the University of Pretoria.en
dc.description.urihttp://www.elsevier.com/locate/envdeven
dc.identifier.citationOfoegbu, C., Chirwa, W.P., Francis, J. & Babalola, F.D. 2016, 'Assessing forest-based rural communities' adaptive capacity and coping strategies for climate variability and change :  the case of Vhembe district in South Africa', Environmental Development, vol. 18, pp. 36-51.en
dc.identifier.issn2211-4645 (online)en
dc.identifier.other10.1016/j.envdev.2016.03.001en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/60616
dc.language.isoEnglishen
dc.publisherElsevieren
dc.rights© 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Notice : this is the author's version of a work that was accepted for publication in Environmental Development. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. A definitive version was subsequently published in vol. 18, pp. 36-51, 2016. doi : 10.1016/j.envdev.2016.03.001.en
dc.subjectClimate variability and changeen
dc.subjectCommunity resilienceen
dc.subjectCoping strategyen
dc.subjectLivelihooden
dc.subjectAdaptationen
dc.subjectAdaptive capacityen
dc.titleAssessing forest-based rural communities' adaptive capacity and coping strategies for climate variability and change :  the case of Vhembe district in South Africaen
dc.typePostprint Articleen

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Ofoegbu_Assessing_2016.pdf
Size:
604.4 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Postprint Article