(115–116) Proposals to eliminate the Latin requirement for the valid publication of plant names
dc.contributor.author | Figueiredo, Estrela | |
dc.contributor.author | Moore, Gerry | |
dc.contributor.author | Smith, G.F. (Gideon Francois), 1959- | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2011-06-09T06:25:12Z | |
dc.date.available | 2011-06-09T06:25:12Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2010-04 | |
dc.description.abstract | Article 36.1 in the International code of botanical nomenclature requires that, as from 1 January 1935, all names of new plant taxa (algae and fossils excepted) must be accompanied by a Latin description or diagnosis in order to be validly published. In this issue (Figueiredo & al. in Taxon 59: 617–620) it is argued that the Latin requirement must be removed now as it represents a relict that does not serve the purposes for which it was originally intended. We propose that, as from the effective date of the Melbourne Code, a diagnosis or description in any language would suffice to effect valid publication of a plant name, once the other Articles have been complied with. | en |
dc.identifier.citation | Figueiredo, E, Moore, G & Smith, GF 2010, '(115–116) Proposals to eliminate the Latin requirement for the valid publication of plant names', Taxon, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 656–666. [http://www.botanik.univie.ac.at/iapt/s_taxon.php] | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 0040-0262 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2263/16738 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | International Association for Plant Taxonomy | en_US |
dc.rights | © 2009 by International Association for Plant Taxonomy | en_US |
dc.subject | Plant names | en |
dc.subject | International Code of Botanical Nomenclature, 2006 | en |
dc.subject | Botanical Latin | en |
dc.subject | Botanical nomenclature | en |
dc.subject.lcsh | Plants -- Nomenclature | en |
dc.subject.lcsh | Plants -- Indexes | en |
dc.title | (115–116) Proposals to eliminate the Latin requirement for the valid publication of plant names | en |
dc.type | Article | en |