Control of paratuberculosis : who, why and how. A review of 48 countries
Loading...
Date
Authors
Whittington, Richard
Donat, Karsten
Weber, Maarten F.
Kelton, David
Nielsen, Soren Saxmose
Eisenberg, Suzanne
Arrigoni, Norma
Juste, Ramon
Saez, Jose Luis
Dhand, Navneet
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
BioMed Central
Abstract
Paratuberculosis, a chronic disease affecting ruminant livestock, is caused by Mycobacterium avium subsp.
paratuberculosis (MAP). It has direct and indirect economic costs, impacts animal welfare and arouses public health
concerns. In a survey of 48 countries we found paratuberculosis to be very common in livestock. In about half the
countries more than 20% of herds and flocks were infected with MAP. Most countries had large ruminant
populations (millions), several types of farmed ruminants, multiple husbandry systems and tens of thousands of
individual farms, creating challenges for disease control. In addition, numerous species of free-living wildlife were
infected. Paratuberculosis was notifiable in most countries, but formal control programs were present in only 22
countries. Generally, these were the more highly developed countries with advanced veterinary services. Of the
countries without a formal control program for paratuberculosis, 76% were in South and Central America, Asia and
Africa while 20% were in Europe. Control programs were justified most commonly on animal health grounds, but
protecting market access and public health were other factors. Prevalence reduction was the major objective in
most countries, but Norway and Sweden aimed to eradicate the disease, so surveillance and response were their
major objectives. Government funding was involved in about two thirds of countries, but operations tended to be
funded by farmers and their organizations and not by government alone. The majority of countries (60%) had
voluntary control programs. Generally, programs were supported by incentives for joining, financial compensation
and/or penalties for non-participation. Performance indicators, structure, leadership, practices and tools used in
control programs are also presented. Securing funding for long-term control activities was a widespread problem.
Paratuberculosis, a chronic disease affecting ruminant livestock, is caused by Mycobacterium avium subsp.
paratuberculosis (MAP). It has direct and indirect economic costs, impacts animal welfare and arouses public health
concerns. In a survey of 48 countries we found paratuberculosis to be very common in livestock. In about half the
countries more than 20% of herds and flocks were infected with MAP. Most countries had large ruminant
populations (millions), several types of farmed ruminants, multiple husbandry systems and tens of thousands of
individual farms, creating challenges for disease control. In addition, numerous species of free-living wildlife were
infected. Paratuberculosis was notifiable in most countries, but formal control programs were present in only 22
countries. Generally, these were the more highly developed countries with advanced veterinary services. Of the
countries without a formal control program for paratuberculosis, 76% were in South and Central America, Asia and
Africa while 20% were in Europe. Control programs were justified most commonly on animal health grounds, but
protecting market access and public health were other factors. Prevalence reduction was the major objective in
most countries, but Norway and Sweden aimed to eradicate the disease, so surveillance and response were their
major objectives. Government funding was involved in about two thirds of countries, but operations tended to be
funded by farmers and their organizations and not by government alone. The majority of countries (60%) had
voluntary control programs. Generally, programs were supported by incentives for joining, financial compensation
and/or penalties for non-participation. Performance indicators, structure, leadership, practices and tools used in
control programs are also presented. Securing funding for long-term control activities was a widespread problem.
Description
Additional file 1: Questionnaire 27–11-18 final. Clean printout of
on-line questionnaire document.
Additional file 2: Table S1 to S14 ver 25–2-19 final. Tabulated results.
Additional file 3: Fig. S25-S2-S19 final. Data plots.
Additional file 4: Country-specific summaries 25–2-19 Tables.
Additional file 5: Table S15 ver 25–2-19 final.
Additional file 2: Table S1 to S14 ver 25–2-19 final. Tabulated results.
Additional file 3: Fig. S25-S2-S19 final. Data plots.
Additional file 4: Country-specific summaries 25–2-19 Tables.
Additional file 5: Table S15 ver 25–2-19 final.
Keywords
Paratuberculosis, Control, Prevalence, Cattle, Sheep, Goat, Camelid, Deer, Wildlife, Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis (MAP)
Sustainable Development Goals
Citation
Whittington, R., Donat, K., Weber, M.F. et al. 2019, 'Control of paratuberculosis : who, why and how. A review of 48 countries', BMC Veterinary Research, vol. 15, art. 198, pp. 1-29.