Comparison of three sorbents for thin film solid phase microextraction of haloacetic acids from water

dc.contributor.authorVan der Merwe, Petra
dc.contributor.authorForbes, Patricia B.C.
dc.contributor.emailpatricia.forbes@up.ac.zaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-04T08:00:57Z
dc.date.available2024-09-04T08:00:57Z
dc.date.issued2024-08
dc.descriptionDATA AVAILABILITY : The data supporting this article have been included as part of the electronic supplementary information.en_US
dc.description.abstractWater disinfection inevitably leads to disinfection byproduct formation, such as haloacetic acids. Many disinfection byproducts reportedly have adverse health effects and, in many instances, including four haloacetic acids, are classified as potential carcinogens. As the global awareness of these compounds increases, more regulatory bodies include certain disinfection byproduct groups in their regulations. Rugged, fast, and cheap analytical quantification methods are therefore crucial. In this paper, a thin film extraction method for haloacetic acids is outlined. Thin films were synthesized in-house using a spin coating procedure, which allowed for easy adjustment of the sorbent choice and film geometry. PDMS, Carboxen®, and HLB were of interest and their extraction potential for HAAs from spiked water was tested in three film variations. PDMS films impregnated with HLB or Carboxen® improved the extraction drastically compared to PDMS films. Specifically, HLB impregnated films achieved excellent extraction efficiencies for tri-substituted analytes (51% for BDCAA, 77% for CDBAA, and 92% TBAA), which are often present at extremely low concentrations in water. In addition to the extraction experiment, a computational model was applied to compare PDMS and HLB. Trends observed in the computational data reflected in the experimental results, showing the validity of the model and confirming that physisorption through hydrogen bonding was mainly responsible for successful extraction.en_US
dc.description.departmentChemistryen_US
dc.description.librarianhj2024en_US
dc.description.sdgSDG-06:Clean water and sanitationen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe Department of Chemistry and the Laboratory for Microscopy and Microanalysis of the University of Pretoria and Rand Water.en_US
dc.description.urihttp://pubs.rsc.org/en/Journals/JournalIssues/AYen_US
dc.identifier.citationVan der Merwe, P. & Forbes, P. 2024, 'Comparison of three sorbents for thin film solid phase microextraction of haloacetic acids from water', Analytical Methods, vol. 16, no. 30, pp. 5154-5165, doi : 10.1039/d4ay00634h.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1759-9660 (print)
dc.identifier.issn1759-9679 (online)
dc.identifier.other10.1039/d4ay00634h
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/98009
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherRoyal Society of Chemistryen_US
dc.rights© The Royal Society of Chemistry 2024. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported Licence.en_US
dc.subjectWater disinfectionen_US
dc.subjectThin filmsen_US
dc.subjectMicroextractionen_US
dc.subjectDisinfection byproduct (DBP)en_US
dc.subjectTrihalomethanes (THMs)en_US
dc.subjectHaloacetic acids (HAAs)en_US
dc.subjectPolydimethylsiloxane (PDMS)en_US
dc.subjectPDMS thin filmsen_US
dc.subjectSDG-06: Clean water and sanitationen_US
dc.titleComparison of three sorbents for thin film solid phase microextraction of haloacetic acids from wateren_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
VanDerMerwe_Comparison_2024.pdf
Size:
1.19 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
VanDerMerwe_ComparisonSuppl_2024.pdf
Size:
1003.94 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Supplementary Material

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: