Marketing practices and information quality for over-the-counter (OTC) hearing aids on Amazon.com

dc.contributor.authorConway, Kylie
dc.contributor.authorKnoetze, Megan Clarissa
dc.contributor.authorSwanepoel, De Wet
dc.contributor.authorSharma, Anu
dc.contributor.authorNassiri, Ashley
dc.contributor.authorManchaiah, Vinaya
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-18T04:47:52Z
dc.date.issued2026-02
dc.description.abstractINTRODUCTION : Over-the-counter (OTC) hearing aids have become increasingly accessible, yet limited information exists regarding their online listings and marketing practices. This study evaluated cost, satisfaction ratings, review, volume, readability of product descriptions, and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) clearance status of OTC hearing aid listings on Amazon.com. MATERIALS AND METHODS : This cross-sectional, descriptive study analyzed 138 Amazon OTC hearing aid listings. Listing characteristics were extracted, and FDA clearance or registration was verified. Analyses included descriptive data on listing characteristics and nonparametric analysis of key variables: price, FDA-clearance status, device type, and form factor. Readability indices were used to assess the accessibility of product descriptions. RESULTS : Of the 138 listings analyzed, 92 listings (66.7%) identified their product as “OTC hearing aids,” while only 37 (26.8%) were verified as FDA-cleared or registered. FDA-cleared/registered devices cost significantly more than non-FDA-cleared devices. Behind-the-ear (BTE) devices had a significantly higher number of reviews compared with in-the-ear (ITE) devices. The readability of product descriptions was advanced, ranging from 11th-grade to college graduate levels. In addition, 52 listings (37.7%) lacked specific marketing for mild-to-moderate hearing loss, and 13 (9.4%) were marketed to those with hearing loss beyond mild-to-moderate. DISCUSSION : Amazon listings for OTC hearing aids reveal significant inconsistencies in marketing and labeling, including misleading FDA clearance claims and inadequate accessibility of product information. Advanced readability levels and marketing for hearing loss degrees beyond mild-to-moderate further impede consumers’ ability to make informed purchasing decisions. These findings highlight the urgent need for stricter regulatory oversight and improved dissemination of accurate, accessible consumer information.
dc.description.departmentSpeech-Language Pathology and Audiology
dc.description.embargo2027-02-01
dc.description.librarianhj2026
dc.description.sdgSDG-03: Good health and well-being
dc.description.urihttps://journals.lww.com/otology-neurotology/pages/default.aspx
dc.identifier.citationConway, K., Knoetze, M., Swanepoel, D. et al. 2026, 'Marketing practices and information quality for over-the-counter (OTC) hearing aids on Amazon.com', Otology & Neurotology, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. e145-e150, doi : 10.1097/MAO.0000000000004767.
dc.identifier.issn1531-7129 (print)
dc.identifier.issn1537-4505 (online)
dc.identifier.other10.1097/MAO.0000000000004767
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/108346
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherLippincott, Williams and Wilkins
dc.rights© 2025, Otology & Neurotology, Inc.
dc.subjectHearing loss
dc.subjectOver-the-counter (OTC)
dc.subjectOTC hearing aids
dc.subjectOnline health information
dc.subjectMarketing and labeling
dc.titleMarketing practices and information quality for over-the-counter (OTC) hearing aids on Amazon.com
dc.typePostprint Article

Files

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: