Risks associated with suspected dysphagia in NICU-admitted infants in a South African public hospital : a retrospective study

dc.contributor.advisorKritzinger, Alta M. (Aletta Margaretha)en
dc.contributor.emailjacolineschoeman2@gmail.comen
dc.contributor.postgraduateSchoeman, Jacolineen
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-12T11:38:57Z
dc.date.available2017-05-12T11:38:57Z
dc.date.created2017-04-24en
dc.date.issued2016en
dc.descriptionDissertation (M Communication Pathology)--University of Pretoria, 2016.en
dc.description.abstractBackground: The prevalence of neonatal dysphagia is increasing, as medical advances contribute to the survival of critically ill and preterm infants. Additional factors such as low birth weight (LBW), gastroesoephageal reflux disorder (GERD), failure to thrive (FTT) and exposure to HIV may increase the complexity of dysphagia symptoms. Knowledge of context-specific risk factors for dysphagia in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) may lead to an effective pathway of diagnosis and management in vulnerable neonates. Objective: The objective was to describe the feeding characteristics and categories of underlying medical conditions in 24 to 42 week gestational age infants while still in the NICU and who were referred for feeding and swallowing assessment. Method: The study was a retrospective investigation of 231 purposively selected medical and speech-language therapy records. Participants had a mean stay of 28.5 days in the NICU of a peri-urban public hospital and all had feeding concerns. An existing seven-category framework for the classification of suspected dysphagia was used. Results: Feeding characteristics of the participants demonstrated that 65.0% had previous enteral tube (NGT/OGT) feeding, and only 15.6% were referred for instrumental assessments such as a VFSS by doctors or speech-language therapists (SLTs). The majority of participants used a mixed manner of feeding such as cup and breastfeeding, or cup and syringe feeding. Only 29.7% of participants was able to breastfeed exclusively which was an indication of feeding difficulties as the hospital where the study was conducted promotes exclusive breastfeeding. Results indicated that the majority of participants (90.04%) presented with multiple medical conditions. Underlying neurological conditions (48.48%) and feeding difficulties secondary to systemic illness (65.80%) contributed mostly to suspected dysphagia in the sample. It was found that 70.99% of infants presented with feeding difficulties secondary to other conditions such as LBW and prematurity, highlighting the need for an expanded dysphagia classification framework. Conclusion: The results are in agreement with the outcomes of previous research and confirm the need for a unique classification framework for dysphagia in South Africa. Neonatal dysphagia is a complex condition and frequently associated with multiple risk factors.en_ZA
dc.description.availabilityUnrestricteden
dc.description.degreeMCommunication Pathologyen
dc.description.departmentSpeech-Language Pathology and Audiologyen
dc.identifier.citationSchoeman, J 2016, Risks associated with suspected dysphagia in NICU-admitted infants in a South African public hospital : a retrospective study, M Communication Pathology Dissertation, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, viewed yymmdd <http://hdl.handle.net/2263/60419>en
dc.identifier.otherA2017en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/60419
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherUniversity of Pretoriaen
dc.rights© 2017 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria.en
dc.subjectFeeding difficultiesen
dc.subjectNeonatal dysphagiaen
dc.subjectPaediatric dysphagiaen
dc.subjectPublic hospitalen
dc.subjectUCTDen
dc.titleRisks associated with suspected dysphagia in NICU-admitted infants in a South African public hospital : a retrospective studyen_ZA
dc.typeDissertationen

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Schoeman_Risks_2016.pdf
Size:
9 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Dissertation