Active versus passive learning : comparative case study of problem-solving competencies in stoichiometry

dc.contributor.authorMamombe, Charles
dc.contributor.authorMathabathe, Kgadi Clarrie
dc.contributor.emailkgadi.mathabathe@up.ac.zaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-21T05:12:59Z
dc.date.available2025-01-21T05:12:59Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.descriptionDATA AVAILABITY STATEMENT: Data supporting the findings and conclusions are available upon request from the corresponding author.en_US
dc.description.abstractTeaching methods can help learners to develop problem-solving skills and enhance their achievement in stoichiometry. Process oriented guided inquiry learning (POGIL) is one of the teaching methods that promote problem-solving skills because it provides opportunities for learners to work with many formulae through many steps in solving problems such as stoichiometric calculations of number of moles and concentration of solutions. To understand how POGIL can improve learners’ achievement and develop problem-solving skills, four grade 11 physical sciences classes of mixed gender and multicultural black learners were purposefully and conventional sampled from four different township schools in Pretoria, South Africa. Through pre- and post-test case study and lesson observations, two different independent groups (POGIL group and lecture group) were included in the study. POGIL group constituted 48 students, while lecture group 62 students taught by their respective teachers at their schools for three weeks using English second language. The results from the pre-test suggest that learners in all the four classes lacked problem-solving competencies in solving both the low-order and the high-order stoichiometry questions. According to the research interpretation, lesson observations of POGIL were active learning while lecture method was passive learning. The post-test results indicate statistically significant greater problem-solving competencies in POGIL group than in the lecture group. The study recommends the use of POGIL in teaching stoichiometry.en_US
dc.description.departmentScience, Mathematics and Technology Educationen_US
dc.description.sdgSDG-04:Quality Educationen_US
dc.description.urihttp://www.ejmste.comen_US
dc.identifier.citationMamombe, C., and Mathabathe, K. C. (2024). Active versus passive learning: Comparative case study of problem-solving competencies in stoichiometry. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(6), em2455. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14594.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1305-8223 (online)
dc.identifier.issn1305-8215 (print)
dc.identifier.other10.29333/ejmste/14594
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/100201
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherModestum LTDen_US
dc.rights© 2024 by the authors; licensee Modestum. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).en_US
dc.subjectStoichiometryen_US
dc.subjectActive learningen_US
dc.subjectProblem-solving competencyen_US
dc.subjectLecture methoden_US
dc.subjectSDG-04: Quality educationen_US
dc.subjectProcess oriented guided inquiry learning (POGIL)en_US
dc.titleActive versus passive learning : comparative case study of problem-solving competencies in stoichiometryen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Mamombe_Active_2024.pdf
Size:
552.63 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: