Dynamic edge effects in small mammal communities across a conservation-agricultural interface in Swaziland

dc.contributor.authorHurst, Zachary M.
dc.contributor.authorMcCleery, Robert A.
dc.contributor.authorCollier, Bret A.
dc.contributor.authorFletcher, Robert J.
dc.contributor.authorSilvy, Nova J.
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, P.J. (Peter John)
dc.contributor.authorMonadjem, Ara
dc.contributor.editorFenton, Brock
dc.date.accessioned2013-11-25T07:37:12Z
dc.date.available2013-11-25T07:37:12Z
dc.date.issued2013-09-09
dc.description.abstractAcross the planet, high-intensity farming has transformed native vegetation into monocultures, decreasing biodiversity on a landscape scale. Yet landscape-scale changes to biodiversity and community structure often emerge from processes operating at local scales. One common process that can explain changes in biodiversity and community structure is the creation of abrupt habitat edges, which, in turn, generate edge effects. Such effects, while incredibly common, can be highly variable across space and time; however, we currently lack a general analytical framework that can adequately capture such spatio-temporal variability. We extend previous approaches for estimating edge effects to a non-linear mixed modeling framework that captures such spatio-temporal heterogeneity and apply it to understand how agricultural land-uses alter wildlife communities. We trapped small mammals along a conservation-agriculture land-use interface extending 375 m into sugarcane plantations and conservation land-uses at three sites during dry and wet seasons in Swaziland, Africa. Sugarcane plantations had significant reductions in species richness and heterogeneity, and showed an increase in community similarity, suggesting a more homogenized small mammal community. Furthermore, our modeling framework identified strong variation in edge effects on communities across sites and seasons. Using small mammals as an indicator, intensive agricultural practices appear to create high-density communities of generalist species while isolating interior species in less than 225 m. These results illustrate how agricultural land-use can reduce diversity across the landscape and that effects can be masked or magnified, depending on local conditions. Taken together, our results emphasize the need to create or retain natural habitat features in agricultural mosaics.en_US
dc.description.departmentZoology and Entomology
dc.description.departmentMammal Research Institute
dc.description.librarianam2013en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipTexas A&M Agrilife Researchen_US
dc.description.urihttp://www.plosone.orgen_US
dc.identifier.citationHurst ZM, McCleery RA, Collier BA, Fletcher RJ Jr, Silvy NJ, et al. (2013) Dynamic Edge Effects in Small Mammal Communities across a Conservation-Agricultural Interface in Swaziland. PLoS ONE 8(9): e74520. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0074520en_US
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.other10.1371/journal.pone.0074520
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/32592
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPublic Library of Scienceen_US
dc.rights© 2013 Hurst et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licenseen_US
dc.subjectSmall mammal communitiesen_US
dc.subjectConservation-agriculture land-use interfaceen_US
dc.subjectEdge effects on communitiesen_US
dc.titleDynamic edge effects in small mammal communities across a conservation-agricultural interface in Swazilanden_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Hurst_Dynamic_2013.pdf
Size:
691.29 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: