Occupational health barriers in South Africa : a call for Ubuntu

dc.contributor.authorZungu, Muzimkhulu
dc.contributor.authorSpiegel, Jerry M.
dc.contributor.authorYassi, Annalee
dc.contributor.authorMoyo, Dingani
dc.contributor.authorVoyi, K.V.V. (Kuku)
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-15T12:38:16Z
dc.date.available2024-08-15T12:38:16Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.descriptionDATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT: All data related to the manuscript is available within the manuscript.en_US
dc.description.abstractMany low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) grapple with shortages of health workers, a crucial component of robust health systems. The COVID-19 pandemic underscored the imperative for appropriate staffing of health systems and the occupational health (OH) threats to health workers. Issues related to accessibility, coverage, and utilization of OH services in public sector health facilities within LMICs were particularly accentuated during the pandemic. This paper draws on the observations and experiences of researchers engaged in an international collaboration to consider how the South African concept of Ubuntu provides a promising way to understand and address the challenges encountered in establishing and sustaining OH services in public sector health facilities. Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, the collaborators actively participated in implementing and studying OH and infection prevention and control measures for health workers in South Africa and internationally as part of the World Health Organizations’ Collaborating Centres for Occupational Health. The study identified obstacles in establishing, providing, maintaining and sustaining such measures during the pandemic. These challenges were attributed to lack of leadership/stewardship, inadequate use of intelligence systems for decision-making, ineffective health and safety committees, inactive trade unions, and the strain on occupational health professionals who were incapacitated and overworked. These shortcomings are, in part, linked to the absence of the Ubuntu philosophy in implementation and sustenance of OH services in LMICs.en_US
dc.description.departmentSchool of Health Systems and Public Health (SHSPH)en_US
dc.description.sdgSDG-03:Good heatlh and well-beingen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe International Development Research Centre.en_US
dc.description.urihttps://www.annalsofglobalhealth.org/en_US
dc.identifier.citationZungu, M., Spiegel, J., Yassi, A., Moyo, D. & Voyi, K. Occupational Health Barriers in South Africa: A Call for Ubuntu. Annals of Global Health. 2024; 90(1): 35, 1–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/aogh.4424.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2214-9996 (online)
dc.identifier.other10.5334/aogh.4424
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/97679
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUbiquity Pressen_US
dc.rights© 2024 The Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.en_US
dc.subjectOccupational health servicesen_US
dc.subjectBarriersen_US
dc.subjectHealth workersen_US
dc.subjectUbuntuen_US
dc.subjectSDG-03: Good health and well-beingen_US
dc.subjectLow- and middle-income countries (LMICs)en_US
dc.titleOccupational health barriers in South Africa : a call for Ubuntuen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Zungu_Occupational_2024.pdf
Size:
746.8 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: