The value of integrated reporting in South Africa

dc.contributor.authorMokabane, Maatabudi
dc.contributor.authorDu Toit, Elda
dc.contributor.emailelda.dutoit@up.ac.zaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-22T06:25:21Z
dc.date.available2023-02-22T06:25:21Z
dc.date.issued2022-08-23
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND : South Africa is currently the only country in the world where its largest stock exchange has adopted integrated reporting on an 'apply and explain' basis, through the implementation of the King Code for Corporate Governance (King IV). However, there exists significant uncertainty regarding the value of adopting integrated reporting AIM : The objective of this study is to establish whether organisations, perceived to produce higher-quality integrated reports, achieve better financial performance or if the value of integrated reporting lies in improving organisational legitimacy and managing stakeholders' impressions SETTING : The sample consists of the Ernst & Young (EY) ranked companies listed on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE) from 2011 to 2020 METHOD : The study examines whether the quality of integrated reporting is associated with various financial performance measures, namely liquidity, solvency, profitability, and market performance, using multinomial logistic regression RESULTS : The multinomial logistic regression model is weak and indicates no direct relationship between integrated reporting quality and financial performance. An investigation into specific variables in the model indicates that top-performing companies, in terms of integrated reporting quality, tend to have significantly lower price-to-book value ratios and higher return on equity values. Companies with the best quality integrated reports also appear to be larger in terms of market capitalisation than those companies who prepare integrated reports of lesser quality CONCLUSION : The results of the study do not record a significant relationship between integrated reporting quality and financial performance. The results indicate that larger companies listed on the JSE produce better quality integrated reports. This may be an indication that companies produce integrated reports, not for their financial value-adding benefits but to maintain organisational legitimacy and to manage the impressions of stakeholders.en_US
dc.description.departmentFinancial Managementen_US
dc.description.librarianam2023en_US
dc.description.urihttp://www.sajems.orgen_US
dc.identifier.citationMokabane, M. & Du Toit, E., 2022, ‘The value of integrated reporting in South Africa’, South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences 25(1), a4305. https://DOI.org/ 10.4102/ sajems.v25i1.4305en_US
dc.identifier.issn1015-8812 (print)
dc.identifier.issn2222-3436 (online)
dc.identifier.other10.4102/ sajems.v25i1.4305
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.up.ac.za/handle/2263/89733
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAOSISen_US
dc.rights© 2022. The Authors. Licensee: AOSIS. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License.en_US
dc.subjectIntegrated reportingen_US
dc.subjectValue of integrated reportingen_US
dc.subjectOrganisational legitimacyen_US
dc.subjectCorporate governanceen_US
dc.subjectImpression managementen_US
dc.titleThe value of integrated reporting in South Africaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Mokabane_Value_2022.pdf
Size:
712.75 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.75 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: