Comparative study of the optical and economic performance of etendue-conserving compact linear Fresnel reflector concepts

dc.contributor.authorRungasamy, A.E.
dc.contributor.authorCraig, K.J. (Kenneth)
dc.contributor.authorMeyer, Josua P.
dc.contributor.emailken.craig@up.ac.zaen_ZA
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-15T12:01:03Z
dc.date.issued2019-03
dc.description.abstractThis paper presents a comparative performance investigation of three Compact linear Fresnel collectors; a flat collector, a sun-tracking etendue-conserving collector and an off-peak etendue-conserving collector. A Monte Carlo ray tracing program is used to simulate the fields. The resultant incident radiation on the receiver aperture is used to quantify the geometric intercept factor and optical efficiency of the field. Each field is then optimised for mirror width and the ratio between the mirrors targeting each receiver aperture. The three fields are then compared on the basis of performance. The off-peak etendue-conserving compact linear Fresnel field reaches a peak geometric intercept factor of 92%, while the sun-tracking etendue-conserving field and flat field had a peak geometric intercept factor of 83% and 79% respectively. A maximum total plant cost for the same Levelized Electricity Cost is presented to incorporate a cost comparison.en_ZA
dc.description.departmentMechanical and Aeronautical Engineeringen_ZA
dc.description.embargo2020-03-15
dc.description.librarianhj2019en_ZA
dc.description.sponsorshipThe University of Pretoria (South Africa) and the South African National Research Foundation (DST-NRF Solar Spoke).en_ZA
dc.description.urihttp://www.elsevier.com/locate/soleneren_ZA
dc.identifier.citationRungasamy, A.E., Craig, K.J. & Meyer, J.P. 2019, 'Comparative study of the optical and economic performance of etendue-conserving compact linear Fresnel reflector concepts', Solar Energy, vol. 181, pp. 95-107.en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn0038-092X
dc.identifier.other10.1016/j.solener.2019.01.081
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/71113
dc.language.isoenen_ZA
dc.publisherElsevieren_ZA
dc.rights© 2019 International Solar Energy Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Notice : this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Solar Energy. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. A definitive version was subsequently published in Solar Energy, vol. 181, pp. 95-107, 2019. doi : 10.1016/j.solener.2019.01.081.en_ZA
dc.subjectEtendue conservingen_ZA
dc.subjectCompact linear Fresnelen_ZA
dc.subjectOptimizationen_ZA
dc.subjectOptical efficiencyen_ZA
dc.subject.otherEngineering, built environment and information technology articles SDG-04
dc.subject.otherSDG-04: Quality education
dc.subject.otherEngineering, built environment and information technology articles SDG-07
dc.subject.otherSDG-07: Affordable and clean energy
dc.subject.otherEngineering, built environment and information technology articles SDG-08
dc.subject.otherSDG-08: Decent work and economic growth
dc.subject.otherEngineering, built environment and information technology articles SDG-09
dc.subject.otherSDG-09: Industry, innovation and infrastructure
dc.subject.otherEngineering, built environment and information technology articles SDG-12
dc.subject.otherSDG-12: Responsible consumption and production
dc.subject.otherEngineering, built environment and information technology articles SDG-13
dc.subject.otherSDG-13: Climate action
dc.titleComparative study of the optical and economic performance of etendue-conserving compact linear Fresnel reflector conceptsen_ZA
dc.typePostprint Articleen_ZA

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Rungasamy_Comparative_2019.pdf
Size:
432.36 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Postprint Article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.75 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: