Perceptions of veterinarians in bovine practice and producers with beef cow-calf operations enrolled in the US voluntary bovine Johne's disease control program concerning economic losses associated with Johne's disease

Abstract

This study compares the perceptions of producers and veterinarians on the economicimpacts of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis (MAP) infection in cow-calfherds. Questionnaires were mailed to beef producers through the Designated Johne’sCoordinators and to veterinarians belonging to a nationwide professional organization.Important components of losses associated with MAP infected cows were used to estimatetotal loss per infected cow-year using an iterative approach based on collected survey data.Veterinarians were more likely to perceive a lower calving percentage in MAP infectedcows compared to producers (P = 0.02). Income lost due to the presence of Johne’s disease(JD) in an infected cattle herd was perceived to be higher by veterinarians (P < 0.01). Com-pared to veterinarians without JD certification, seedstock producers were more likely toperceive genetic losses due to culling cows positive for MAP (P < 0.01). There were mixedopinions regarding the magnitude of lowered weaning weight in calves from infected cowsand perceived differences in risk of other diseases or conditions in infected cows. An annualloss of $235 (95% CR: $89–$457) for each infected animal was estimated based on infor-mation from the producer survey. The analogous estimate using information inputs fromveterinarians was $250 ($82–$486). Mean annual loss due to JD in a 100 cow herd with a7% true prevalence was $1644 ($625–$3250) based on information provided by producers.Similarly, mean annual loss based on information collected from veterinarians was $1747($575–$3375).