Can citizen science analysis of camera trap data be used to study reproduction? Lessons from snapshot Serengeti program

dc.contributor.authorThel, Lucie
dc.contributor.authorChamaillé-Jammes, Simon
dc.contributor.authorKeurinck, Léa
dc.contributor.authorCatala, Maxime
dc.contributor.authorPacker, Craig
dc.contributor.authorHuebner, Sarah E.
dc.contributor.authorBonenfant, Christophe
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-29T09:17:19Z
dc.date.available2022-04-29T09:17:19Z
dc.date.issued2021-03
dc.description.abstractEcologists increasingly rely on camera-trap data to estimate biological parameters such as population abundance. Because of the huge amount of data camera trap can generate, the assistance of non-scientists is often sought after, but an assessment of the data quality is necessary. We tested whether volunteers data from one of the largest citizen science projects – Snapshot Serengeti – could be used to study breeding phenology. We tested whether the presence of juveniles (less than one or 12 months old) of species of large herbivores in the Serengeti: topi, kongoni, Grant’s gazelle, could be reliably detected by the ‘naive’ volunteers versus trained observers. We expected a positive correlation between the proportion of volunteers identifying juveniles and their effective presence within photographs, assessed by the trained observers. The agreement between the trained observers was good (Fleiss’ κ > 0.61 for juveniles of less than one and 12 month(s) old), suggesting that morphological criteria can be used to determine age of juveniles. The relationship between the proportion of volunteers detecting juveniles less than a month old and their actual presence plateaued at 0.45 for Grant’s gazelle, reached 0.70 for topi and 0.56 for kongoni. The same relationships were much stronger for juveniles younger than 12 months, reaching 1 for topi and kongoni. The absence of individuals < one month and the presence of juveniles < 12 months could be reliably assumed, respectively, when no volunteer and when all volunteers reported a presence of a young. In contrast, the presence of very young individuals and the absence of juveniles appeared more difficult to ascertain from volunteers’ classification, given how the classification task was presented to them. Volunteers’ classification allows a moderately accurate but quick sorting of photograph with/without juveniles. We discuss the limitations of using citizen science camera-traps data to study breeding phenology, and the options to improve the detection of juveniles.en_US
dc.description.departmentMammal Research Instituteen_US
dc.description.departmentZoology and Entomologyen_US
dc.description.librarianpm2022en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipA PhD fellowship from the University Lyon 1.en_US
dc.description.urihttp://www.wildlifebiology.comen_US
dc.identifier.citationThel, L., Chamaillé-Jammes, S., Keurinck, L., et al. 2021, 'Can citizen science analysis of camera trap data be used to study reproduction? Lessons from snapshot Serengeti program', Wildlife Biology, vol. 2021, no. 2, art. wlb.00833, pp. 1-9. https://doi.org/10.2981/wlb.00833.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0909-6396 (print)
dc.identifier.other10.2981/wlb.00833
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.up.ac.za/handle/2263/84978
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherNordic Society Oikosen_US
dc.rights© 2021 The Authors. This is an Open Access article licensed under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY).en_US
dc.subjectAfrican ungulatesen_US
dc.subjectAge determinationen_US
dc.subjectAlcelaphus cokiien_US
dc.subjectDamaliscus jimelaen_US
dc.subjectNanger grantien_US
dc.titleCan citizen science analysis of camera trap data be used to study reproduction? Lessons from snapshot Serengeti programen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Thel_Citizen_2021.pdf
Size:
978.63 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.75 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: