Guidelines for phytosociological classifications and descriptions of vegetation in southern Africa

dc.contributor.authorBrown, Leslie R.
dc.contributor.authorDu Preez, Pieter J.
dc.contributor.authorBezuidenhout, Hugo
dc.contributor.authorBredenkamp, George J.
dc.contributor.authorMostert, T.H.C. (Theodorus Hendrik Cornelis)
dc.contributor.authorCollins, Nacelle B.
dc.date.accessioned2013-10-09T11:17:43Z
dc.date.available2013-10-09T11:17:43Z
dc.date.issued2013-07-23
dc.description.abstractChanges in the environment are first observed in changes in the vegetation. Vegetation survey, classification and mapping form the basis on which informed and scientifically defendable decisions on the environment can be taken. The classification and mapping of vegetation is one of the most widely used tools for interpreting complex ecosystems. By identifying different plant communities we are essentially identifying different ecosystems at a particular hierarchical level. Phytosociologists in Europe have been involved in such studies following, in particular, the Braun-Blanquet approach since the early 1900s. In South Africa, such studies were undertaken on a limited basis from the early 1970s and have since then steadily increased. The surveying of the enormous diversity of South African vegetation is one of the objectives of phytosociological studies. The demand for such data has steadily increased over the past few years to guide conservation policies, biodiversity studies and ecosystem management. In South Africa, numerous publications on the vegetation of conservation and other areas in the different biomes have been produced over the last few decades. However, vegetation scientists in South Africa experience unique problems. The purpose of this article is therefore to provide an overview of the history and the specific focus of phytosociological studies in South Africa and to recommend minimum requirements and methods to be followed when conducting such studies. It is believed that the incorporation of these requirements will result in scientifically justifiable research of high quality by phytosociologists in South Africa. CONSERVATIOM IMPLICATIONS: Effective conservation cannot be obtained without a thorough knowledge of the ecosystems present in an area. Consistent vegetation classifications and descriptions form the basis of conservation and monitoring exercises to maintain biodiversity. The incorporation of these guidelines and requirements will facilitate quality phytosociological research in South Africa.en_US
dc.description.librarianam2013en_US
dc.description.urihttp://www.koedoe.co.zaen_US
dc.identifier.citationBrown, L.R., Du Preez, P.J., Bezuidenhout, H., Bredenkamp, G.J., Mostert, T.H.C. & Collins, N.B., 2013, ‘Guidelines for phytosociological classifications and descriptions of vegetation in southern Africa’, Koedoe 55(1), Art. #1103, 10 pages. http://dx.DOI.org/ 10.4102/koedoe.v55i1.1103en_US
dc.identifier.issn0075-6458 (print)
dc.identifier.issn2071-0771 (online)
dc.identifier.other10.4102/koedoe.v55i1.1103
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/31981
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAOSIS Open Journalsen_US
dc.rights© 2013. The Authors. Licensee: AOSIS OpenJournals. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License.en_US
dc.subjectVegetationen_US
dc.subjectPhytosociological studies in South Africaen_US
dc.titleGuidelines for phytosociological classifications and descriptions of vegetation in southern Africaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Brown_Guidelines(2013).pdf
Size:
468.44 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: