Lessons learned from somatic cell nuclear transfer
dc.contributor.author | Gouveia, Chantel | |
dc.contributor.author | Huyser, Carin | |
dc.contributor.author | Egli, Dieter | |
dc.contributor.author | Pepper, Michael Sean | |
dc.contributor.email | michael.pepper@up.ac.za | en_ZA |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-11-04T06:24:04Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-11-04T06:24:04Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020-03-27 | |
dc.description.abstract | Somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) has been an area of interest in the field of stem cell research and regenerative medicine for the past 20 years. The main biological goal of SCNT is to reverse the di erentiated state of a somatic cell, for the purpose of creating blastocysts from which embryonic stem cells (ESCs) can be derived for therapeutic cloning, or for the purpose of reproductive cloning. However, the consensus is that the low e ciency in creating normal viable o spring in animals by SCNT (1–5%) and the high number of abnormalities seen in these cloned animals is due to epigenetic reprogramming failure. In this review we provide an overview of the current literature on SCNT, focusing on protocol development, which includes early SCNT protocol deficiencies and optimizations along with donor cell type and cell cycle synchrony; epigenetic reprogramming in SCNT; current protocol optimizations such as nuclear reprogramming strategies that can be applied to improve epigenetic reprogramming by SCNT; applications of SCNT; the ethical and legal implications of SCNT in humans; and specific lessons learned for establishing an optimized SCNT protocol using a mouse model. | en_ZA |
dc.description.department | Immunology | en_ZA |
dc.description.department | Obstetrics and Gynaecology | en_ZA |
dc.description.librarian | am2020 | en_ZA |
dc.description.sponsorship | The South African Medical Research Council | en_ZA |
dc.description.uri | http://www.mdpi.com/journal/ijms | en_ZA |
dc.identifier.citation | Gouveia, C., Huyser, C., Egli, D. et al. 2020, 'Lessons learned from somatic cell nuclear transfer', International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 21, art. 2314, pp. 1-24. | en_ZA |
dc.identifier.issn | 1422-0067 (online) | |
dc.identifier.other | 10.3390/ijms21072314 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2263/76688 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_ZA |
dc.publisher | MDPI Publishing | en_ZA |
dc.rights | © 2020 by the authors. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. | en_ZA |
dc.subject | Oocyte | en_ZA |
dc.subject | Enucleation | en_ZA |
dc.subject | Somatic cell | en_ZA |
dc.subject | Nuclear transfer | en_ZA |
dc.subject | Cloning | en_ZA |
dc.subject | Epigenetic reprogramming | en_ZA |
dc.subject | Nuclear reprogramming | en_ZA |
dc.subject | Somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) | en_ZA |
dc.subject | Embryonic stem cell (ESC) | en_ZA |
dc.title | Lessons learned from somatic cell nuclear transfer | en_ZA |
dc.type | Article | en_ZA |