What benefit-sharing mechanisms can help forestry-based land restitution beneficiaries in South Africa? The case of Limpopo province forestry projects
dc.contributor.author | Makhubele, Lucky | |
dc.contributor.author | Tshidzumba, R.P. (Ratsodo Phillip) | |
dc.contributor.author | Chirwa, Paxie W. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-04-05T07:09:48Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
dc.description.abstract | The capture of the benefits by the elites due to the lack of a benefit-sharing mechanism is a serious threat to the development of forestry land restitution projects in South Africa. This study investigated the benefit-sharing mechanisms desirable to land claimant beneficiaries in forestry-based land restitution projects. A random sampling technique was used to select 351 and 170 households’ beneficiaries in Levubu and Tzaneen communities in Limpopo Province, respectively. Data were collected using a household questionnaire and focus group discussions. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyse data. Findings revealed that there are still no benefit-sharing mechanisms in Levubu and Tzaneen communities, but the beneficiaries comprehend the significance of developing a benefit-sharing mechanism for fair and equal distribution of benefits. The results revealed that stakeholders’ meetings (58.7%) and open beneficiaries’ meetings (40.6%) were preferred mechanisms. In addition, beneficiaries in both Levubu (54.4%) and Tzaneen (68.9%) preferred to receive benefits monthly. This paper provides the first overview of a benefit-sharing model in forestry-based land restitution projects in South Africa. It concludes that there is a need to consider the early development of a benefit-sharing mechanism in land restitution projects in order to allow a greater equal share of the benefits. | en_US |
dc.description.department | Plant Production and Soil Science | en_US |
dc.description.embargo | 2023-06-27 | |
dc.description.librarian | hj2023 | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | The South African Forestry Company Limited (SAFCOL). | en_US |
dc.description.uri | https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tftl20 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Lucky Makhubele, Ratsodo Tshidzumba & Paxie Chirwa (2022) What benefit-sharing mechanisms can help forestry-based land restitution beneficiaries in South Africa? The case of Limpopo province forestry projects, Forests, Trees and Livelihoods, 31:3, 153-169, DOI: 10.1080/14728028.2022.2089735. | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1472-8028 (print) | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2164-3075 (online) | |
dc.identifier.other | 10.1080/14728028.2022.2089735 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2263/90359 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Taylor and Francis | en_US |
dc.rights | © 2022 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. This is an electronic version of an article published in Forests, Trees and Livelihoods, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 153-169, 2022. doi : 10.1080/14728028.2022.2089735. Forests, Trees and Livelihoods is available online at : https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tftl20. | en_US |
dc.subject | Benefit-sharing | en_US |
dc.subject | Community forestry | en_US |
dc.subject | Forestry projects | en_US |
dc.subject | Elites | en_US |
dc.subject | Land reform | en_US |
dc.subject | Land restitution | en_US |
dc.title | What benefit-sharing mechanisms can help forestry-based land restitution beneficiaries in South Africa? The case of Limpopo province forestry projects | en_US |
dc.type | Postprint Article | en_US |