What benefit-sharing mechanisms can help forestry-based land restitution beneficiaries in South Africa? The case of Limpopo province forestry projects

dc.contributor.authorMakhubele, Lucky
dc.contributor.authorTshidzumba, R.P. (Ratsodo Phillip)
dc.contributor.authorChirwa, Paxie W.
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-05T07:09:48Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractThe capture of the benefits by the elites due to the lack of a benefit-sharing mechanism is a serious threat to the development of forestry land restitution projects in South Africa. This study investigated the benefit-sharing mechanisms desirable to land claimant beneficiaries in forestry-based land restitution projects. A random sampling technique was used to select 351 and 170 households’ beneficiaries in Levubu and Tzaneen communities in Limpopo Province, respectively. Data were collected using a household questionnaire and focus group discussions. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyse data. Findings revealed that there are still no benefit-sharing mechanisms in Levubu and Tzaneen communities, but the beneficiaries comprehend the significance of developing a benefit-sharing mechanism for fair and equal distribution of benefits. The results revealed that stakeholders’ meetings (58.7%) and open beneficiaries’ meetings (40.6%) were preferred mechanisms. In addition, beneficiaries in both Levubu (54.4%) and Tzaneen (68.9%) preferred to receive benefits monthly. This paper provides the first overview of a benefit-sharing model in forestry-based land restitution projects in South Africa. It concludes that there is a need to consider the early development of a benefit-sharing mechanism in land restitution projects in order to allow a greater equal share of the benefits.en_US
dc.description.departmentPlant Production and Soil Scienceen_US
dc.description.embargo2023-06-27
dc.description.librarianhj2023en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe South African Forestry Company Limited (SAFCOL).en_US
dc.description.urihttps://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tftl20en_US
dc.identifier.citationLucky Makhubele, Ratsodo Tshidzumba & Paxie Chirwa (2022) What benefit-sharing mechanisms can help forestry-based land restitution beneficiaries in South Africa? The case of Limpopo province forestry projects, Forests, Trees and Livelihoods, 31:3, 153-169, DOI: 10.1080/14728028.2022.2089735.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1472-8028 (print)
dc.identifier.issn2164-3075 (online)
dc.identifier.other10.1080/14728028.2022.2089735
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/90359
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor and Francisen_US
dc.rights© 2022 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. This is an electronic version of an article published in Forests, Trees and Livelihoods, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 153-169, 2022. doi : 10.1080/14728028.2022.2089735. Forests, Trees and Livelihoods is available online at : https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tftl20.en_US
dc.subjectBenefit-sharingen_US
dc.subjectCommunity forestryen_US
dc.subjectForestry projectsen_US
dc.subjectElitesen_US
dc.subjectLand reformen_US
dc.subjectLand restitutionen_US
dc.titleWhat benefit-sharing mechanisms can help forestry-based land restitution beneficiaries in South Africa? The case of Limpopo province forestry projectsen_US
dc.typePostprint Articleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Makhubele_What_2022.pdf
Size:
1.43 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Postprint Article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.75 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: