Comparative assessment of widespread irrigation with low quality mine-water in undisturbed and rehabilitated mine-lands in the upper Olifants using the ACRU2000 model

dc.contributor.authorIdowu, O.A.
dc.contributor.authorLorentz, Simon A.
dc.contributor.authorAnnandale, John George
dc.contributor.authorAken, Mark Ernest
dc.contributor.authorMcCartney, M.P.
dc.contributor.authorThornton-Dibb, S.L.C.
dc.contributor.authorWesthuizen, A.
dc.date.accessioned2011-01-27T06:48:42Z
dc.date.available2011-01-27T06:48:42Z
dc.date.issued2010-10
dc.description.abstractThe ACRU agrohydrological model, in the form of ACRU2000 and its salinity module, ACRUSalinity, was employed in catchment-scale assessment of widespread irrigation with low quality mine-water in undisturbed (un-mined) and rehabilitated soils in the Upper Olifants basin of South Africa. The study area comprised a small catchment of 4.7 km2 located in a coal-mine environment, known as the Tweefontein Pan catchment. The catchment drained to a surface reservoir (Tweefontein Reservoir) of maximum capacity and surface area 4 000 Mℓ and 1.5 km2, respectively. The catchment was instrumented to measure hydrodynamic responses and simulated as a hydrological system. Consideration was given to runoff, groundwater storage, evapotranspiration, baseflow, interception, irrigation water supply and rainfall, thereby accounting for all the dominant hydrological components of the system. Three scenarios were simulated using the available records for 5 years (1999 to 2004). The first was a baseline scenario representing the prevailing condition in the study area and the other 2 scenarios represented widespread irrigation with the mine-water on undisturbed and rehabilitated soils. In simulating the widespread irrigation on rehabilitated soils, a distinction was made between a rehabilitated irrigated area before and after the re-establishment of the equilibrium water table. Comparison of the results from the simulated scenarios indicated that a greater undisturbed area (max of 160 ha) than rehabilitated area (max of 120 ha) could be irrigated with mine-water from the Tweefontein Reservoir. Irrigation on rehabilitated soils depleted the water in the reservoir more rapidly than irrigation on undisturbed soils, due to lower runoff and higher ingress to groundwater in rehabilitated areas.en
dc.identifier.citationIdowu, OA, Lorentz, SA, Annandale, JG, Aken, M, McCartney, MP, Thornton-Dibb, SLC & Westhuizen, A 2010, 'Comparative assessment of widespread irrigation with low quality mine-water in undisturbed and rehabilitated mine-lands in the upper Olifants using the ACRU2000 model', Water SA, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 543-552. [http://www.wrc.org.za]en
dc.identifier.issn0378-4738
dc.identifier.issn1816-7950 (online)
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/15778
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWater Research Councilen_US
dc.rightsWater Research Councilen_US
dc.subjectWidespread irrigationen
dc.subjectMined land irrigationen
dc.subjectACRU2000en
dc.subject.lcshMine water -- South Africa -- Upper Olifants basinen
dc.subject.lcshIrrigation projects -- South Africa -- Upper Olifants basinen
dc.subject.lcshHydrological surveys -- South Africa -- Upper Olifants basinen
dc.subject.lcshWater salinization -- South Africa -- Upper Olifants basinen
dc.titleComparative assessment of widespread irrigation with low quality mine-water in undisturbed and rehabilitated mine-lands in the upper Olifants using the ACRU2000 modelen
dc.typeArticleen

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Idowu_Comparative(2010).pdf
Size:
833.5 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.44 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: