Recommendations for the next generation of global freshwater biological monitoring tools

dc.contributor.authorJackson, Michelle C.
dc.contributor.authorWeyl, O.L.F.
dc.contributor.authorAltermatt, F.
dc.contributor.authorDurance, I.
dc.contributor.authorFriberg, Nikolai
dc.contributor.authorDumbrell, A.J.
dc.contributor.authorPiggott, J.J.
dc.contributor.authorTiegs, S.D.
dc.contributor.authorTockner, K.
dc.contributor.authorKrug, C.B.
dc.contributor.authorLeadley, P.W.
dc.contributor.authorWoodward, G.
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-30T13:07:13Z
dc.date.available2018-01-30T13:07:13Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.description.abstractBiological monitoring has a long history in freshwaters, where much of the pioneering work in this field was developed over a 100 years ago—but few of the traditional monitoring tools provide the global perspective on biodiversity loss and its consequences for ecosystem functioning that are now needed. Rather than forcing existing monitoring paradigms to respond to questions they were never originally designed to address, we need to take a step back and assess the prospects for novel approaches that could be developed and adopted in the future. To resolve some of the issues with indicators currently used to inform policymakers, we highlight new biological monitoring tools that are being used, or could be developed in the near future, which (1) consider less-studied taxonomic groups, (2) are standardised across regions to allow global comparisons, and (3) measure change over multiple time points. The new tools we suggest make use of some of the key technological and logistical advances seen in recent years—including remote sensing, molecular tools, and local-to-global citizen science networks. We recommend that these new indicators should be considered in future assessments of freshwater ecosystem health and contribute to the evidence base for global to regional (and national) assessments of biodiversity and ecosystem services: for example, within the emerging framework of the Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services.en_ZA
dc.description.departmentZoology and Entomologyen_ZA
dc.description.librarianhj2018en_ZA
dc.description.urihttps://www.elsevier.com/books/book-series/advances-in-ecological-researchen_ZA
dc.identifier.citationackson, M.C., Weyl, O.L.F., Altermatt, F. 2016, 'Recommendations for the next generation of global freshwater biological monitoring tools', Advances in Ecological Research, vol. 55, pp. 615-636.en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn0065-2504
dc.identifier.other10.1016/bs.aecr.2016.08.008
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/63802
dc.language.isoenen_ZA
dc.publisherElsevieren_ZA
dc.rights© 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All right reserved. Notice : this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Cell. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. A definitive version was subsequently published in Advances in Ecological Research, vol. 55, pp. 615-636, 2016. doi : 10.1016/bs.aecr.2016.08.008.en_ZA
dc.subjectEcological networksen_ZA
dc.subjectMultiple stressorsen_ZA
dc.subjectRemote sensingen_ZA
dc.subjecteDNAen_ZA
dc.subjectNext-generation sequencingen_ZA
dc.subjectGlobal biomonitoringen_ZA
dc.subjectIPBESen_ZA
dc.titleRecommendations for the next generation of global freshwater biological monitoring toolsen_ZA
dc.typePostprint Articleen_ZA

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Jackson_Recommendations_2016.pdf
Size:
506.97 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Postprint Article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.75 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: