Comparison of the efficiency of the Onderstepoort- and Centres for Disease Control ultraviolet light traps for the collection of livestock associated Culicoides species in South Africa

dc.contributor.authorVenter, Gert Johannes
dc.contributor.authorSebitsang, S.S.
dc.contributor.authorSwart, V.R.
dc.contributor.authorBoikanyo, S.N.B.
dc.contributor.authorDe Beer, C.J.
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-07T12:04:24Z
dc.date.issued2022-03
dc.description.abstractComparative monitoring of the abundance and distribution of Culicoides biting midges (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae), the biological vectors of the causative agents of several diseases of global veterinary importance, will be crucial in determining the risk of disease outbreak and spread. Ultraviolet (UV) suction traps have become the most frequent method used for the monitoring of Culicoides diversity and abundance. The current study compared the trapping efficiency of the two most used UV suction light traps, i.e., the Onderstepoort (OP)- and the Centres for Disease Control trap, for the collection of livestock associated Culicoides species in South Africa. The study confirmed the superiority of the OP trap and indicated a correlation in species composition and age grading results as determine with the two trap types. Substantial variations in the comparative trap efficiency, as found between areas and sites within an area, suggest that a universal conversion factor between the two trap types may not be advisable as it is unclear to what extent species composition and environmental factors may influence the conversion factor. Light traps, independent of trap model, can be considered acceptable for determining the serial comparison of population numbers for seasonal fluctuation and species abundance in distribution surveys.en_ZA
dc.description.departmentVeterinary Tropical Diseasesen_ZA
dc.description.embargo2022-11-22
dc.description.librarianhj2021en_ZA
dc.description.sponsorshipThe Agricultural Research Council–Onderstepoort Veterinary Research, The South African Department of Science and Technology and the National Research Foundation of South Africa.en_ZA
dc.description.urihttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/13652915en_ZA
dc.identifier.citationVenter, G.J., Sebitsang, S.S., Swart, V.R. et al. 2022, 'Comparison of the efficiency of the Onderstepoort- and Centres for Disease Control ultraviolet light traps for the collection of livestock associated Culicoides species in South Africa', Medical and Veterinary Entomology, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 113-126, doi: 10.1111/mve.12558. NYP.en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn0269-283X (print)
dc.identifier.issn1365-2915 (online)
dc.identifier.other10.1111/mve.12558
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/82987
dc.language.isoenen_ZA
dc.publisherWileyen_ZA
dc.rights© 2021 The Royal Entomological Society. This is the pre-peer reviewed version of the following article : 'Comparison of the efficiency of the Onderstepoort- and Centres for Disease Control ultraviolet light traps for the collection of livestock associated Culicoides species in South Africa', Medical and Veterinary Entomology, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 113-126, 2022, doi : 10.1111/mve.12558. The definite version is available at : https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/13652915.en_ZA
dc.subjectCulicoides imicolaen_ZA
dc.subjectCulicoides species diversityen_ZA
dc.subjectTrap typeen_ZA
dc.subjectConversion factoren_ZA
dc.subjectSouth Africa (SA)en_ZA
dc.titleComparison of the efficiency of the Onderstepoort- and Centres for Disease Control ultraviolet light traps for the collection of livestock associated Culicoides species in South Africaen_ZA
dc.typePostprint Articleen_ZA

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Venter_Comparison_2022.pdf
Size:
1.48 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Postprint Article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.75 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: