Methodological considerations in the professional accreditation research

dc.contributor.authorAyaya, Onesmus
dc.contributor.authorPretorius, Marius
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-09T05:33:25Z
dc.date.available2022-06-09T05:33:25Z
dc.date.issued2021-10
dc.description.abstractThis essay paper provides methodological considerations for research on turnaround management (business rescue) practitioner (BRP) accreditation. The article responds to recent BRP licensing debates and the need to enhance BRP capabilities through continuing professional development (CPD). We assess existing data collection procedures using the practice theory and demonstrate sequenced integrated data collection procedures (IDCPs) to study BRPs’ professional accreditation frameworks. We illustrate IDCPs using a research design for “how BRPs should be accredited by their professional bodies (PBs) before obtaining a practice license”. The proposed IDCPs call for the purposeful interpretation of legislative instruments governing BRP work and other multiple-party data collection techniques. The paper lays out the problems associated with using questionnaire surveys and semi-structured interviews to document BRP practices and the required professional capabilities. We propose a research design to illustrate the application of the IDCPs in a multiple PB occupation.en_US
dc.description.departmentBusiness Managementen_US
dc.description.librarianpm2022en_US
dc.description.urihttp://www.sagepub.com/journals/Journal202037en_US
dc.identifier.citationAyaya O, Pretorius M. Methodological Considerations in the Professional Accreditation Research. SAGE Open 11(4): 1-20. October 2021. doi:10.1177/21582440211052557.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2158-2440 (online)
dc.identifier.other10.1177/21582440211052557
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.up.ac.za/handle/2263/85756
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSageen_US
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2021. Creative Commons CC BY: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.en_US
dc.subjectAccreditationen_US
dc.subjectDoubleen_US
dc.subjectPurposiveen_US
dc.subjectInterpretationen_US
dc.subjectInterviewen_US
dc.subjectIntegrateden_US
dc.subjectProfessionalen_US
dc.subjectBusiness rescue practitioners (BRPs)en_US
dc.subjectContinuing professional development (CPD)en_US
dc.subjectIntegrated data collection procedure (IDCP)en_US
dc.subjectProfessional bodies (PBs)en_US
dc.titleMethodological considerations in the professional accreditation researchen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Ayaya_Methodological_2021.pdf
Size:
603.1 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.75 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: