Monitoring of unconventional oil and gas extraction and its policy implications : a case study from South Africa

dc.contributor.authorEsterhuyse, Surina
dc.contributor.authorAvenant, Marinda
dc.contributor.authorRedelinghuys, Nola
dc.contributor.authorKijko, Andrzej
dc.contributor.authorGlazewski, Jan
dc.contributor.authorPlit, Lisa
dc.contributor.authorKemp, Marthie
dc.contributor.authorSmit, Ansie
dc.contributor.authorVos, A. Tascha
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-21T12:58:08Z
dc.date.issued2018-07
dc.description.abstractBiophysical and socio-economic monitoring during unconventional oil and gas (UOG) extraction is important to assess change and to have reference conditions against which to identify UOG extraction activity impacts. The large-scale cumulative impacts of UOG extraction makes standardised monitoring across geographic and socio-political regions important. This article emphasises the importance of a robust monitoring framework that must serve as a guideline for planning monitoring activities during UOG extraction. A case study from South Africa is presented to illustrate important aspects to address during the development of a UOG extraction monitoring framework. The South African case is critically assessed and resultant policy implications are discussed. Important policy considerations include performing baseline monitoring during UOG extraction, performing UOG extraction monitoring in an integrated, systematic, and standardised manner, ensuring that proper resources are available to perform the monitoring and implementing an adaptive management plan that is linked to UOG extraction monitoringen_ZA
dc.description.departmentGeologyen_ZA
dc.description.embargo2019-07-01
dc.description.librarianhj2018en_ZA
dc.description.sponsorshipThe Water Research Commission , South Africaen_ZA
dc.description.urihttp://www.elsevier.com/locate/enpolen_ZA
dc.identifier.citationEsterhuyse, S., Avenant, M., Redelinghuys, N. et al. 2018, 'Monitoring of unconventional oil and gas extraction and its policy implications : a case study from South Africa', Energy Policy, vo. 118, pp. 109-120.en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn0301-4215 (print)
dc.identifier.issn1873-6777 (online)
dc.identifier.other10.1016/j.enpol.2018.03.001
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/66304
dc.language.isoenen_ZA
dc.publisherElsevieren_ZA
dc.rights© 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Notice : this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Energy Policy. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. A definitive version was subsequently published in Energy Policy, vol. 118, pp. 109-120, 2018. doi : 10.1016/j.enpol.2018.03.001.en_ZA
dc.subjectUnconventional oil and gas (UOG)en_ZA
dc.subjectBiophysicalen_ZA
dc.subjectSocio-economicen_ZA
dc.subjectMonitoringen_ZA
dc.subjectFrameworken_ZA
dc.subjectPolicy developmenten_ZA
dc.subjectSouth Africa (SA)en_ZA
dc.subjectAustraliaen_ZA
dc.subjectInvestmenten_ZA
dc.subjectDimensionsen_ZA
dc.subjectFrackingen_ZA
dc.subjectPennsylvaniaen_ZA
dc.subjectManagementen_ZA
dc.subjectImpactsen_ZA
dc.subjectUnited States (US)en_ZA
dc.subjectCumulative effects assessmenten_ZA
dc.subjectCorporate social responsibility (CSR)en_ZA
dc.titleMonitoring of unconventional oil and gas extraction and its policy implications : a case study from South Africaen_ZA
dc.typePostprint Articleen_ZA

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Esterhuyse_Monitoring_2018.pdf
Size:
1.43 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Postprint Article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.75 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: