Psychometric properties, measurement invariance, and construct validity of the subjective career success inventory

dc.contributor.authorOlckers, Chantal
dc.contributor.authorKoekemoer, Eileen
dc.contributor.emailchantal.olckers@up.ac.zaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-05T09:22:45Z
dc.date.available2023-06-05T09:22:45Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.descriptionDATA AVAILABITY STATEMENT : Data is available upon request from the authors.en_US
dc.description.abstractWith the increased scholarly interest in career success measurements, this study investigated the construct validity and measurement invariance of the Subjective Career Success Inventory. A sample of 736 South African employees participated in the study. Latent variable modelling was performed to estimate and sequentially compare several independent cluster models of confirmatory factor analysis (ICM-CFA) (i.e., unidimensional, first-factor, second-factor, and bifactor models). The results supported the construct validity for an eight-dimensional construct with acceptable convergent and discriminant validity. We found measurement invariance across gender. Task performance was related to the eight subjective career success dimensions, providing evidence of nomological validity. KEY POINTS : WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS TOPIC : (1) The Subjective Career Success Inventory (SCSI) is increasingly being used to measure subjective career success, but studies reporting comprehensive psychometric properties for the SCSI are scarce. (2) Literature indicates various factorial permutations for the instrument, and limited validation studies have been conducted on the SCSI. (3) Although scholars have argued gender gaps in the experiences of career success, a thorough investigation of the SCSI has not been done to corroborate such differences. WHAT THIS TOPIC ADDS : (1) The eight-factor structure of the SCSI was confirmed within the South African context. (2) The SCSI demonstrated invariance between males and females. (3) Task performance was related to the eight SCSI dimensions, providing evidence of nomological validity.en_US
dc.description.departmentHuman Resource Managementen_US
dc.description.librarianhj2023en_US
dc.description.urihttps://www.tandfonline.com/loi/raup20en_US
dc.identifier.citationChantal Olckers & Eileen Koekemoer (2022) Psychometric properties, measurement invariance, and construct validity of the subjective career success inventory, Australian Journal of Psychology, 74:1, 2121177, DOI: 10.1080/00049530.2022.2121177.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0004-9530 (print)
dc.identifier.issn1742-9536 (online)
dc.identifier.other10.1080/00049530.2022.2121177
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/91022
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor and Francisen_US
dc.rights© 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.en_US
dc.subjectBifactor confirmatory factor analysesen_US
dc.subjectConstruct validityen_US
dc.subjectGenderen_US
dc.subjectMeasurement invarianceen_US
dc.subjectSubjective career successen_US
dc.subjectSDG-05: Gender equalityen_US
dc.subjectSDG-08: Decent work and economic growthen_US
dc.titlePsychometric properties, measurement invariance, and construct validity of the subjective career success inventoryen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Olckers_Psychometric_2022.pdf
Size:
2.04 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: