Remotely piloted aircraft systems as a rhinoceros anti-poaching tool in Africa

dc.contributor.authorMulero-Pazmany, Margarita
dc.contributor.authorStolper, Roel
dc.contributor.authorVan Essen, L.D.
dc.contributor.authorNegro, Juan J.
dc.contributor.authorSassen, Tyrell
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-29T10:01:26Z
dc.date.available2014-05-29T10:01:26Z
dc.date.issued2014-01-08
dc.description.abstractOver the last years there has been a massive increase in rhinoceros poaching incidents, with more than two individuals killed per day in South Africa in the first months of 2013. Immediate actions are needed to preserve current populations and the agents involved in their protection are demanding new technologies to increase their efficiency in the field. We assessed the use of remotely piloted aircraft systems (RPAS) to monitor for poaching activities. We performed 20 flights with 3 types of cameras: visual photo, HD video and thermal video, to test the ability of the systems to detect (a) rhinoceros, (b) people acting as poachers and (c) to do fence surveillance. The study area consisted of several large game farms in KwaZulu-Natal province, South Africa. The targets were better detected at the lowest altitudes, but to operate the plane safely and in a discreet way, altitudes between 100 and 180 m were the most convenient. Open areas facilitated target detection, while forest habitats complicated it. Detectability using visual cameras was higher at morning and midday, but the thermal camera provided the best images in the morning and at night. Considering not only the technical capabilities of the systems but also the poachers modus operandi and the current control methods, we propose RPAS usage as a tool for surveillance of sensitive areas, for supporting field anti-poaching operations, as a deterrent tool for poachers and as a complementary method for rhinoceros ecology research. Here, we demonstrate that low cost RPAS can be useful for rhinoceros stakeholders for field control procedures. There are, however, important practical limitations that should be considered for their successful and realistic integration in the anti-poaching battle.en_US
dc.description.librarianam2014en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was conducted within the Projects: Aeromab, (Andalusia Government, Project for Excellence, 2007, P07-RNM-03246) and Planet (European Commission 7th FP Grant Agreement 257649) granted to Don˜ana Biological Station, CSIC. Centre for Wildlife Management (University of Pretoria) and CSIR contributed to the study with their own funds.en_US
dc.description.urihttp://www.plosone.orgen_US
dc.identifier.citationMulero-Pazmany M, Stolper R, van Essen LD, Negro JJ, Sassen T (2014) Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems as a Rhinoceros Anti-Poaching Tool in Africa. PLoS ONE 9(1): e83873. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083873en_US
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.other10.1371/journal.pone.0083873
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/39928
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPublic Library of Scienceen_US
dc.rights© 2014 Mulero-Pa´zma´ny et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licenseen_US
dc.subjectAircraft systemsen_US
dc.subjectRhinocerosen_US
dc.subjectAnti-poachingen_US
dc.subjectAfricaen_US
dc.subjectSouth Africaen_US
dc.subjectRemotely piloted aircraft systems (RPAS)en_US
dc.titleRemotely piloted aircraft systems as a rhinoceros anti-poaching tool in Africaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
MuleroPazmany_Remotely_2014.pdf
Size:
828.53 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: