Conserving alpha and beta diversity in wood-production landscapes

dc.contributor.authorJones, Gavin M.
dc.contributor.authorBrosi, Berry
dc.contributor.authorEvans, Jason M.
dc.contributor.authorGottlieb, Isabel G.W.
dc.contributor.authorLoy, Xingwen
dc.contributor.authorNunez-Regueiro, Mauricio M.
dc.contributor.authorOber, Holly K.
dc.contributor.authorPienaar, Elizabeth Frances
dc.contributor.authorPillay, Rajeev
dc.contributor.authorPisarello, Kathryn
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Lora L.
dc.contributor.authorFletcher, Robert J., Jr.
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-08T05:04:04Z
dc.date.issued2022-06
dc.descriptionSUPPORTING INFORMATION : APPENDIX S1. Distribution of the six land-use types across three ownerships (nonindustrial private, industrial timber, and local/state/federal). APPENDIX S2. Occupancy and detection covariate structures for multispecies occupancy models. APPENDIX S3. Alpha-diversity across the six sampled land uses. APPENDIX S4. Beta-diversity components (total Jaccard dissimilarity, Jaccard turnover, and Jaccard nestedness) for pairwise bioenergy contrasts. APPENDIX S5. Average beta-diversity and beta-diversity components for pairwise land-use comparisons across bats, bees, birds, and reptiles APPENDIX S6. Beta-diversity components (total Jaccard dissimilarity, Jaccard turnover, and Jaccard nestedness) within each of the six land use typesen_US
dc.description.abstractInternational demand for wood and other forest products continues to grow rapidly, and uncertainties remain about how animal communities will respond to intensifying resource extraction associated with woody bioenergy production. We examined changes in alpha and beta diversity of bats, bees, birds, and reptiles across wood production landscapes in the southeastern United States, a biodiversity hotspot that is one of the principal sources of woody biomass globally. We sampled across a spatial gradient of paired forest land-uses (representing pre and postharvest) that allowed us to evaluate biological community changes resulting from several types of biomass harvest. Short-rotation practices and residue removal following clearcuts were associated with reduced alpha diversity (-14.1 and -13.9 species, respectively) and lower beta diversity (i.e., Jaccard dissimilarity) between land-use pairs (0.46 and 0.50, respectively), whereas midrotation thinning increased alpha (+3.5 species) and beta diversity (0.59). Over the course of a stand rotation in a single location, biomass harvesting generally led to less biodiversity. Cross-taxa responses to resource extraction were poorly predicted by alpha diversity: correlations in responses between taxonomic groups were highly variable (-0.2 to 0.4) with large uncertainties. In contrast, beta diversity patterns were highly consistent and predictable across taxa, where correlations in responses between taxonomic groups were all positive (0.05-0.4) with more narrow uncertainties. Beta diversity may, therefore, be a more reliable and information-rich indicator than alpha diversity in understanding animal community response to landscape change. Patterns in beta diversity were primarily driven by turnover instead of species loss or gain, indicating that wood extraction generates habitats that support different biological communities.en_US
dc.description.departmentMammal Research Instituteen_US
dc.description.embargo2022-12-02
dc.description.librarianhj2022en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipUS Department of Agriculture - NIFA.en_US
dc.description.urihttps://wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/cobien_US
dc.identifier.citationJones, G.M., Brosi, B., Evans, J.M., Gottlieb, I.G.W., Loy, X., Núñez-Regueiro, M.M., Ober, H.K., Pienaar, E., Pillay,R., Pisarello, K., Smith, L.L., & Fletcher, R.J. (2022). Conserving alpha and beta diversity in wood-production landscapes. Conservation Biology, 36, e13872. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13872.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0888-8892 (print)
dc.identifier.issn1523-1739 (online)
dc.identifier.other10.1111/cobi.13872
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.up.ac.za/handle/2263/85732
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.rights© 2021 Society for Conservation Biology. This is the pre-peer reviewed version of the following article : Conserving alpha and beta diversity in wood-production landscapes. Conservation Biology, 36, e13872, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13872. The definite version is available at : https://wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/cobi.en_US
dc.subjectAlternative energyen_US
dc.subjectBiodiversityen_US
dc.subjectBioenergyen_US
dc.subjectBiomassen_US
dc.subjectCommunityen_US
dc.subjectMultispeciesen_US
dc.subjectOccupancy modelingen_US
dc.subjectResource extractionen_US
dc.subjectBiodiversidaden_US
dc.subjectBioenergíaen_US
dc.subjectBiomasaen_US
dc.subjectComunidaden_US
dc.subjectEnergía alternativaen_US
dc.subjectExtracción de recursosen_US
dc.subjectModelado de ocupaciónen_US
dc.subjectMultiespecieen_US
dc.titleConserving alpha and beta diversity in wood-production landscapesen_US
dc.typePostprint Articleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Jones_Conserving_2022.pdf
Size:
1.74 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Postprint Article
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Jones_ConservingAppen_2022.pdf
Size:
472.58 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Appendices

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.75 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: