The exceptio doli generalis – back again?
| dc.contributor.author | Veldsman, Lenee | |
| dc.contributor.author | Kuschke, Birgit | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2012-10-22T06:47:24Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2013-10-31T00:20:04Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2012-05 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Before it was abolished in 1988 (the court in Bank of Lisbon and South Africa v De Ornelas 1988 (3) 580 (A) held that the exceptio should never have been accepted as part of our law), a party to a contract could avoid contractual liability based on the bad faith (in other words the reprehensible or unconscionable conduct of the other party to the contract) by raising a specific defence, the exceptio doli generalis (exceptio doli). | en_US |
| dc.identifier.citation | Veldsman, L & Kuschke, B 2012, 'The exceptio doli generalis – back again?', Without Prejudice, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 47-49. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1681-178X | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2263/20245 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | JetBlue | en_US |
| dc.rights | JetBlue | en_US |
| dc.subject | Doli generalis | en_US |
| dc.title | The exceptio doli generalis – back again? | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |