An analysis of parliamentary intelligence oversight in South Africa with speciric reference to the Joint Standing Committee on intelligence

dc.contributor.advisorHough, Mike (Michael)en
dc.contributor.emailupetd@ais.up.ac.zaen
dc.contributor.postgraduateDlomo, Dennis Thokozanien
dc.date.accessioned2013-09-07T10:57:02Z
dc.date.available2005-02-08en
dc.date.available2013-09-07T10:57:02Z
dc.date.created2004-03-10en
dc.date.issued2006-02-08en
dc.date.submitted2005-02-08en
dc.descriptionDissertation (M (Political Sciences))--University of Pretoria, 2006.en
dc.description.abstractThis study analyses parliamentary intelligence oversight in South Africa by assessing the understanding of members of the JSCI of its core business, its mission and vision and powers and functions as are stipulated by law. The study locates the JSCI within an international intelligence oversight milieu through a review and evaluation of selected countries’ intelligence oversight mechanisms. Furthermore, international best practice is sought and applicable lessons are drawn for South Africa. The study is bases on a literature review and interviews with members of the JSCI to gather information and draw insights to evaluate and test the propositions in the context of international and national best practice. The propositions, which are supported by the research, are that: · Intelligence oversight in South Africa under the JSCI has hitherto been relatively effective although there is room for improvement. · The JSCI has good relations with the other arms of the state that are responsible for the oversight of Intelligence in South Africa – making parliamentary intelligence oversight, overall, quite effective. · Despite this effectiveness there are legislative gaps and problems pertaining to the modus operandi of the JSCI that need the attention of both the Executive and Legislature and which could be part of a package of legislative reform. The research supported these propositions whilst pointing out that new initiatives need attention if the culture of oversight is to find root. These are the need to widen the scope of accountability to build a culture of accountability among middle and senior management members of the Intelligence structures and secondly the way Parliament resources the JSCI.en
dc.description.availabilityunrestricteden
dc.description.departmentPolitical Sciencesen
dc.identifier.citationDlomo, D 2004, An analysis of parliamentary intelligence oversight in South Africa with speciric reference to the Joint Standing Committee on intelligence, M dissertation, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, viewed yymmdd < http://hdl.handle.net/2263/27212 >en
dc.identifier.upetdurlhttp://upetd.up.ac.za/thesis/available/etd-02082005-092528/en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/27212
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherUniversity of Pretoriaen_ZA
dc.rights© 2004, University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria.en
dc.subjectJudicial oversighten
dc.subjectAccountabilityen
dc.subjectCivilian oversighten
dc.subjectConventional threatsen
dc.subjectEmerging threatsen
dc.subjectCovert actionen
dc.subjectLegislative oversighten
dc.subjectSecurity clearanceen
dc.subjectNon-partisanshipen
dc.subjectNon-conventional threatsen
dc.subjectNational securityen
dc.subjectIntelligence producten
dc.subjectIntelligence activityen
dc.subjectExecutive oversighten
dc.subjectIntelligence oversighten
dc.subjectUCTDen_US
dc.titleAn analysis of parliamentary intelligence oversight in South Africa with speciric reference to the Joint Standing Committee on intelligenceen
dc.typeDissertationen

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
00dissertation.pdf
Size:
1.03 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format