The effect of production system and management practices on the environmental impact, quality and safety of milk and dairy products

dc.contributor.authorErasmus, Lourens Jacobus
dc.contributor.authorWebb, E.C. (Edward Cottington)
dc.contributor.emaillourens.erasmus@up.ac.zaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-04-11T10:28:07Z
dc.date.available2014-04-11T10:28:07Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.description.abstractThere is an increasing trend to label milk and dairy products according to production system, absence of certain feed additives and non-use of specific technologies. These claims include the practice of organic farming, the absence of ionophore antibiotics and recombinant bovine somatotropin (r-bST) free milk. Absence-claim labels may imply to some consumers that certain milk is safer and more nutritious than other milk. Milk from r-bST supplemented cows is completely safe for human consumption, since bST is a protein, which is digested like other animal and plant proteins, it is species specific, and most bST in milk is denaturated by pasteurization. Fears of higher insulin growth factor 1 (IGF-1) levels in r-bST milk are unfounded, since these are insignificant compared with the daily secretion of IGF-1 in human saliva and gastro-intestinal secretions. r-bST does not affect milk composition. All milk (i.e. conventional, r-bST free and organic) is compositionally similar, and all milk is wholesome. Various studies have also confirmed that r-bST does not affect milk flavour or manufacturing characteristics that are important during the production of processed dairy foods such as cheese or yoghurt. There is no pathway for ionophore antibiotics from feed to milk and there is no scientific basis for concerns that these additives can give rise to transmissible resistance factors that may compromise the therapeutic use of antibiotics in humans. Organic farming is recognized as a possible way forward to improve sustainability in agriculture. However, it typically requires more resources and produces less food, which currently makes it less profitable and a questionable solution to meeting the world’s growing food supply needs. Improving productive efficiency by using technologies is currently the most logical approach to mitigating the environmental impact of the dairy herd. The potential of r-bST and feed additives such as ionophore antibiotics to reduce greenhouse gas emissions should be recognized and implemented where applicable.en_US
dc.description.librarianam2014en_US
dc.description.urihttp://www.sasas.co.zaen_US
dc.identifier.citationErasmus, LJ & Webb, EC 2013, 'The effect of production system and management practices on the environmental impact, quality and safety of milk and dairy products', South African Journal of Animal Science, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 425-434.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0375-1589 (print)
dc.identifier.issn2221-4062 (online)
dc.identifier.other10.4314/sajas.v43i3.12
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/39644
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSouth African Society for Animal Scienceen_US
dc.rightsCopyright resides with the authors in terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 South African Licence.en_US
dc.subjectDairy production systemsen_US
dc.subjectIonophoresen_US
dc.subjectRecombinant bovine somatotropin (r-bST)en_US
dc.subjectOrganic milken_US
dc.titleThe effect of production system and management practices on the environmental impact, quality and safety of milk and dairy productsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Erasmus_Effect_2013.pdf
Size:
112.14 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: